BACKGROUND Postdural puncture headache after accidental dural puncture during labour may lead to chronic sequalae. OBJECTIVES We aimed to measure the incidence of postpartum depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, chronic headache, backache and breastfeeding rates after a postdural puncture headache. DESIGN A retrospective, case-matched cohort study. SETTING A review of documented cases of dural puncture and matched case controls occurring at Rabin Medical Center and Shamir Medical Center from 01 January 2012 to 30 September 2018. PATIENTS The study cohort consisted of women with a documented postdural puncture headache and the controls were women with uneventful labour epidurals in the same 24-h period. Women were interviewed by telephone. PRIMARY OUTCOMES MEASURE The primary outcome measure was the incidence of postpartum depression after a postdural puncture headache. RESULTS Women with postdural puncture headache (n = 132) and controls (n = 276) had similar demographic data. The incidence of postpartum depression was 67/128 (52.3%) versus 31/276 (11.2%) for controls, P < 0.0001, 95% confidence intervals of the difference 31.5 to 50.2. Posttraumatic stress disorder was more frequent among women with postdural puncture headache, 17/132 (12.8%) versus controls 1/276 (0.4%), P < 0.0001, 95% confidence intervals of the difference 7.6 to 19.5. Women with postdural puncture headache breastfed less, 74/126 (54.5%) versus controls 212/276 (76.8%), P < 0.0001, 95% confidence intervals of the difference 33.1 to 55.2. Current headache and backache were significantly more frequent among women with postdural puncture headache [current headache 42/129 (32.6%) versus controls 42/276 (15.2%) P < 0.00001, 95% confidence intervals 0.085 to 0.266; current backache 58/129 (43.9%) versus controls 58/275 (21%) P < 0.0001, 95% confidence intervals 14.1 to 33.5]. CONCLUSION We report an increased incidence of postpartum depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, chronic headache and backache and decreased breastfeeding following a postdural puncture headache. Our findings emphasise the need for postpartum follow-up for women with postdural puncture headache. TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER Clinical trial registry number: NCT03550586.

U mbilical cord prolapse is an emergency with risk for significant complications, including prematurity and birth asphyxia. As cord compression and umbilical arterial vasospasm can lead to fetal hypoxia and

Background There are cases where epidural analgesia is initially effective but subsequently fails and needs to be resited. We evaluated the rate of normal vaginal delivery and operative delivery among parturients who had resited epidurals compared to parturients with epidurals that were not resited. Methods A retrospective electronic medical review of parturients with a singleton gestation attempting normal vaginal delivery under epidural analgesia between the years 2012‐2016 was conducted. Resited epidurals were defined as epidurals that were considered effective but subsequently removed and reinserted. For each resited epidural, two previous and two consecutive deliveries of parturients with normally functioning epidural catheter inserted by the same anesthesiologist were matched controls (non‐resited epidurals). Results There were 35,984 attempted vaginal deliveries with 118 resited epidurals and 472 non‐resited epidurals. When adjusted for nulliparity, oxytocin administration, sex and weight of the baby, and maternal BMI, labor epidural catheter replacement was not associated with need for instrumental or caesarean delivery, (OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.91‐2.49, P = .11). Conclusions Need for labor epidural catheter replacement does not appear to be associated with need for operative delivery based on this single‐centre cohort analysis.

Background: Epidural blood patch is a common effective treatment for postdural puncture headache after accidental dural puncture during labor and may be done in conventional or fluoroscopy-guided methods. The aim of this study was to compare intensity of headache at the time of discharge from the hospital and to compare blood volumes injected in conventional epidural blood patches versus fluoroscopic-guided blood patches and evaluate the side effects of both method of treatment.Methods: Between the years 2010 and 2020, 84 patients who were diagnosed with postdural puncture headache received either a conventional epidural blood patch or a fluoroscopic-guided blood patch. Blood volumes were compared and evaluation of side effects was made based on data collected during and after the procedure.Results: Eighty-four patients were included in this study. Fifty-two women in the conventional epidural blood patch group and 32 in the fluoroscopic-guided blood patch group. Women in the conventional epidural blood patch group received statistically significantly higher doses of blood than women in the fluoroscopic-guided blood patch group: conventional method 29 ml IQR [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] versus fluoroscopic method 16 ml, IQR [12][13][14][15][16][17][18], p < .001 with no difference in headache pain intensity at hospital release. There was no difference between groups in hospital length of stay, or persistent PDPH. There was also no difference chronic headache or backache between the two groups.Conclusions: Women who received fluoroscopic epidural blood patch required a much lower volume of blood injected while there was no difference between groups in headache pain intensity at discharge.