No abstract

The objective of this review is to make physicians aware of new radionuclide methods to detect cardiac effects of chemotherapeutic drugs. This knowledge is important because of the limitations of the physical examination and the electrocardiogram for detecting early reversible cardiac damage. Presently left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is routinely used to screen for cardiotoxicity. Since LVEF obtained by radionuclide angiocardiography is more accurate than the LVEF estimated by echocardiography, serial radionuclide LVEF monitoring is most commonly used to monitor cardiotoxicity. Diastolic measurements of left ventricular function (such as peak filling rate) are now being added to routine LVEF measurements to enhance standard radionuclide evaluation. This screening test should be done prior to beginning therapy and at appropriate points based on the baseline study, therapy scheme and the patient’s clinical status. At some centers, exercise LVEF methods are being used to determine if cardiac reserve is adequate for the patient to tolerate additional chemotherapy when cardiac injury may be present. Previously, endomyocardial biopsy was needed to detect and confirm early anthracycline cardiotoxicity. This invasive test may be replaced by a new noninvasive in vivo method using radioactive monoclonal antibodies against cardiac muscle (indium-lll-antimyosin). Because cardiac failure has been associated with adrenergic neuron injury, it has been proposed that radioactive methyliodo-benzylguanine may detect the adrenergic abnormality which may predict future development of congestive heart failure or sudden death months after therapy is discontinued. Advantages and disadvantages of these methods in evaluating cardiotoxicity, and an algorithm to optimally monitor antitumor therapy-induced cardiomyopathy are discussed.

Mean cold storage and pump times were 6.6 and 26.7 hr, consistent across immunosuppression protocols. Overall DGF and SGF rates were 4.4% (15/339) and 12.1% (41/339). DGF was equally low for pump time less than 24 vs. more than or equal to 24 hr, 5.2% (6/116) vs. 4.0% (9/223) (P=0.63), with similar results after adjusting for known DGF predictors. A significantly lower first BPAR rate was observed for longer pump time (as a continuous variable) among more immunologically active recipients (those having more risk factors: DGF, age <50 yr, and non-white) (univariable P=0.005; multivariable P=0.009), with an estimated hazard ratio of 0.43 (P=0.006) favoring pump time more than or equal to 24 hr among those with more than or equal to two risk factors. CONCLUSIONS.: In this single-center, observational study, MP with prolonged pump times was associated with low DGF/SGF and first BPAR rates, supporting continued use of MP.

In our preliminary experience, recipients of liver grafts from older CNHBDs had an outcome equivalent to that of younger CNHBDs. With the strict evaluation of the donors and brief CIT, liver grafts from older CNHBDs may be used to expand the donor pool.