Introduction The advent of RhD immunoglobulin prophylaxis to prevent maternal RhD alloimmunization has reduced the incidence of this condition and its associated poor outcomes. Consequently, non‐D Rh antibodies now account for a greater proportion of alloimmunized pregnancies. These antibodies have been the subject of comparatively little research. This study investigated the incidence and clinical outcome of pregnancies affected by non‐D Rh alloimmunization at an Australian tertiary maternity service. Material and methods This was a retrospective study of all pregnancies with non‐D Rh antibodies (namely anti‐C, ‐E, ‐c, ‐e, ‐Cw as well as the compound antibodies anti‐CD, ‐cE and ‐ce) managed at the Royal Women's Hospital, Victoria, Australia, from 2009 to 2013 inclusive. Information collected included maternal demographics, details of the antibodies, course of the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Results During the study period, 115 non‐D Rh alloimmunized pregnancies were identified in 102 mothers. Forty‐nine pregnancies reached the critical titer (> 16) from non‐D Rh alone and 11 fetuses received intrauterine red blood cell transfusion. Labor was induced or cesarean section performed in 38 cases. Forty‐three neonates were admitted to the special care nursery and 59 received phototherapy. Nine received treatment for anemia and 10 neonates received intravenous immunoglobulin. Conclusions Non‐D Rh alloimmunization is a relatively uncommon complication of pregnancy, occurring in only .33% of pregnancies in the study period. It can lead to significant fetal/neonatal morbidity (and may lead to mortality). The most severe outcomes (including perinatal deaths) were mostly associated with the compound antibodies anti‐CD and anti‐cE, or a non‐D Rh antibody in conjunction with anti‐D.
The GlycoMark index can be used to monitor women with diabetes in pregnancy, since it has a higher correlation with diabetic neonatal complications compared with the standard glucose control indices.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.