Currently, prognostic and therapeutic determinations for canine cutaneous mast cell tumors (MCTs) are primarily based on histologic grade. However, the use of different grading systems by veterinary pathologists and institutional modifications make the prognostic value of histologic grading highly questionable. To evaluate the consistency of microscopic grading among veterinary pathologists and the prognostic significance of the Patnaik grading system, 95 cutaneous MCTs from 95 dogs were

Histologic grading schemes for canine cutaneous mast cell tumors (MCTs) were not developed for subcutaneous MCTs. Despite this, subcutaneous MCTs are currently categorized by many as grade II or higher. The aim of this investigation was to assess the pathology and clinical outcome for subcutaneous MCTs to provide a more accurate prognosis. Information on clinical outcome for 306 dogs was obtained from veterinarians and correlated with histologic features. Mean and median follow-up was 842 and 891 days, respectively (range, 3-2,305 days). Only 27 (9%) were confirmed as mast cell-related deaths. Metastasis occurred in 13 (4%), and 24 (8%) had local reoccurrence, even though 171 (56%) cases had incomplete surgical margins. Median survival time was not reached, and the estimated 6-month, 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival probabilities were 95%, 93%, 92%, and 86%, respectively. Dogs were euthanized or died as a result of local tumor reoccurrence, additional MCT development distant to the surgical site, or metastasis. Decreased survival time was linked to mitotic index (number of mitotic figures per 10 high-power fields), infiltrative growth pattern, and presence of multinucleation. Both univariable and multivariable analysis showed mitotic index to be strongly predictive of survival, local reoccurrence, and metastasis. The results of the study indicate that the majority of subcutaneous MCTs have a favorable prognosis, with extended survival times and low rates of reoccurrence and metastasis.

The induction of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-specific T-cell responses is widely seen as critical to the development of effective immunity to HIV type 1 (HIV-1). Plasmid DNA and recombinant fowlpox virus (rFPV) vaccines are among the most promising safe HIV-1 vaccine candidates. However, the immunity induced by either vaccine alone may be insufficient to provide durable protection against HIV-1 infection. We evaluated a consecutive immunization strategy involving priming with DNA and boosting with rFPV vaccines encoding common HIV-1 antigens. In mice, this approach induced greater HIV-1-specific immunity than either vector alone and protected mice from challenge with a recombinant vaccinia virus expressing HIV-1 antigens. In macaques, a dramatic boosting effect on DNA vaccine-primed HIV-1-specific helper and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses, but a decline in HIV-1 antibody titers, was observed following rFPV immunization. The vaccine regimen protected macaques from an intravenous HIV-1 challenge, with the resistance most likely mediated by T-cell responses. These studies suggest a safe strategy for the enhanced generation of T-cell-mediated protective immunity to HIV-1.

Molecular assays are widely used to prognosticate canine cutaneous mast cell tumors (MCT). There is limited information about these prognostic assays used on MCT that arise in the subcutis. The aims of this study were to evaluate the utility of KIT immunohistochemical labeling pattern, c-KIT mutational status (presence of internal tandem duplications in exon 11), and proliferation markers-including mitotic index, Ki67, and argyrophilic nucleolar organizing regions (AgNOR)-as independent prognostic markers for local recurrence and/or metastasis in canine subcutaneous MCT. A case-control design was used to analyze 60 subcutaneous MCT from 60 dogs, consisting of 24 dogs with subsequent local recurrence and 12 dogs with metastasis, as compared to dogs matched by breed, age, and sex with subcutaneous MCT that did not experience these events. Mitotic index, Ki67, the combination of Ki67 and AgNOR, and KIT cellular localization pattern were significantly associated with local recurrence and metastasis, thereby demonstrating their prognostic value for subcutaneous MCT. No internal tandem duplication mutations were detected in exon 11 of c-KIT in any tumors. Because c-KIT mutations have been demonstrated in only 20 to 30% of cutaneous MCT and primarily in tumors of higher grade, the number of subcutaneous MCT analyzed in this study may be insufficient to draw conclusions on the role c-KIT mutations in these tumors. KeywordsAgNOR, canine, case-control study, c-KIT, Ki67, mast cell tumor, mitotic index, prognostic markers Subcutaneous mast cell tumors (MCT) are located in the subcutis, usually surrounded by fat. Until recently, 24,35 this type was not investigated separately from its cutaneous counterpart. Subcutaneous MCT are classified by many as grade II MCT, based on current grading schemes.10,27 Because intermediate (grade II) tumors have a highly variable prognosis 10,25,26 and low interobserver agreement among pathologists, 25,26 accurate prognostic data for the subcutaneous variant of MCT are needed. In a recent retrospective survival analysis of subcutaneous MCT from 306 dogs, 35 we demonstrated that the majority of subcutaneous MCT do not behave aggressively, thus confirming the conclusion of a prior smaller study of subcutaneous MCT.24 Furthermore, our results showed that a strong predictor of survival time, time to local recurrence, and metastasis was mitotic index (MI), assessed as the number of mitotic figures per 10 high-power fields. 35MI is a valuable prognostic test 7,31 and an integral part of grading schemes for cutaneous MCT. 3,10,27 Despite this, there are drawbacks to using MI as a sole determinant for assessment of cellular proliferation. Accurate counting of mitotic figures may be influenced by field selection, plane of section, field diameter, intensity of cytoplasmic granularity (or presence of crush artifact), necrosis, and/or apoptotic cells. All of these variables can contribute to interobserver disagreement. In addition, MI detects only cells in the mitotic phase rather than the enti...

The differences in sensitivity between NAT assays can be explained by the input of isolated viral nucleic acid in the amplification reactions. The FDA requirements for sensitivity of NAT blood screening assays can be met by the Gen-probe TMA, as well as by the AmpliScreen assays, particularly when combined with the NucliSens Extractor.