Chromosomal aberrations are a hallmark of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) but alone fail to induce leukaemia. To identify cooperating oncogenic lesions, we performed a genome-wide analysis of leukaemic cells from 242 paediatric ALL patients using high-resolution, single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays and genomic DNA sequencing. Our analyses revealed deletion, amplification, point mutation and structural rearrangement in genes encoding principal regulators of B lymphocyte development and differentiation in 40% of B-progenitor ALL cases. The PAX5 gene was the most frequent target of somatic mutation, being altered in 31.7% of cases. The identified PAX5 mutations resulted in reduced levels of PAX5 protein or the generation of hypomorphic alleles. Deletions were also detected in TCF3 (also known as E2A), EBF1, LEF1, IKZF1 (IKAROS) and IKZF3 (AIOLOS). These findings suggest that direct disruption of pathways controlling B-cell development and differentiation contributes to B-progenitor ALL pathogenesis. Moreover, these data demonstrate the power of high-resolution, genome-wide approaches to identify new molecular lesions in cancer.

Primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) is a unique form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) associated with Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV; HHV-8) that displays a distinct constellation of clinical, morphologic, immunologic, and molecular characteristics. Rare KSHV-containing immunoblastic lymphomas occurring in solid tissues have been described. Whether they represent part of the spectrum of PEL has not been determined. The morphologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular features of KSHV-positive solid lymphomas occurring in 8 HIV+/AIDS patients were systematically investigated and compared with those of 29 similarly analyzed PELs. The 8 KSHV-positive solid lymphomas were virtually indistinguishable from the 29 PELs based on morphology (immunoblastic/anaplastic), immunophenotype (CD45 positive; T cell antigen negative; CD30, EMA, CD138 positive; CD10, CD15, BCL6 negative) and genotype (100% immunoglobulin genes rearranged; no identifiable abnormalities in C-MYC, BCL6, BCL1, BCL2; and uniformly EBV positive). The only identifiable phenotypic difference was that the KSHV-positive solid lymphomas appeared to express B cell-associated antigens (25%) and immunoglobulin (25%) slightly more often than the PELs (<5% and 15%, respectively; P = 0.11 and P = 0.08, respectively). The clinical presentation and course of the patients who develop KSHV-positive solid lymphomas were also similar, except for the lack of an effusion and somewhat better survival (median 11 months vs. 3 months). However, the 3 KSHV-positive solid lymphoma patients alive without disease 11, 25, and 44 months following initial presentation were recently diagnosed patients and, unlike the other patients with KSHV-positive solid lymphomas, received anti-retroviral therapy. These findings strongly suggest that these decidedly rare KSHV-positive solid lymphomas belong to the spectrum of PEL. Therefore, we propose that the KSHV-positive solid lymphomas be designated extra-cavitary PELs.

PURPOSE Alliance/CALGB 50303 (NCT00118209), an intergroup, phase III study, compared dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab (DA-EPOCH-R) with standard rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) as frontline therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients received six cycles of DA-EPOCH-R or R-CHOP. The primary objective was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary clinical objectives included response rate, overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS Between 2005 and 2013, 524 patients were registered; 491 eligible patients were included in the final analysis. Most patients (74%) had stage III or IV disease; International Prognostic Index (IPI) risk groups included 26% IPI 0 to 1, 37% IPI 2, 25% IPI 3, and 12% IPI 4 to 5. At a median follow-up of 5 years, PFS was not statistically different between the arms (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.27; P = .65), with a 2-year PFS rate of 78.9% (95% CI, 73.8% to 84.2%) for DA-EPOCH-R and 75.5% (95% CI, 70.2% to 81.1%) for R-CHOP. OS was not different (hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.59; P = .64), with a 2-year OS rate of 86.5% (95% CI, 82.3% to 91%) for DA-EPOCH-R and 85.7% (95% CI, 81.4% to 90.2%) for R-CHOP. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were more common ( P < .001) in the DA-EPOCH-R arm than the R-CHOP arm, including infection (16.9% v 10.7%, respectively), febrile neutropenia (35.0% v 17.7%, respectively), mucositis (8.4% v 2.1%, respectively), and neuropathy (18.6% v 3.3%, respectively). Five treatment-related deaths (2.1%) occurred in each arm. CONCLUSION In the 50303 study population, the more intensive, infusional DA-EPOCH-R was more toxic and did not improve PFS or OS compared with R-CHOP. The more favorable results with R-CHOP compared with historical controls suggest a potential patient selection bias and may preclude generalizability of results to specific risk subgroups.

No abstract