Objective Cochlear implantation has become the mainstay of treatment for children with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Yet, despite mounting evidence on the clinical benefits of early implantation, little data are available on the long-term societal benefits and comparative effectiveness of this procedure across various ages of implantation--a choice parameter for parents and clinicians with high prognostic value for clinical outcome. As such, the aim of the current study is to evaluate a model of the consequences of the timing of this intervention from a societal economic perspective. Average cost-utility of pediatric cochlear implantation by age at intervention will be analyzed. Design Prospective, longitudinal assessment of health-utility and educational placement outcomes in 175 children recruited from 6 US centers between November 2002 and December 2004, who had severe-to-profound SNHL onset within 1 year of age, underwent cochlear implantation before 5 years of age, and had up to 6 years of post-implant follow-up that ended in November 2008 to December 2011. Costs of care were collected retrospectively and stratified by pre-operative, operative, and post-operative expenditures. Incremental costs and benefits of implantation were compared between the three age groups and relative to a non-implantation baseline. Results Children implanted at <18 months of age gained an average of 10.7 QALYs over their projected lifetime as compared to 9.0 and 8.4 QALYs for those implanted between 18 and 36 months and at >36 months of age, respectively. Medical and surgical complication rates were not significantly different between the 3 age groups. Additionally, mean lifetime costs of implantation were similar between the 3 groups, at approximately $2,000/child/year (77.5 year life expectancy), yielding costs of $14,996, $17,849, and $19,173 per QALY for the youngest, middle, and oldest implant age groups, respectively. Full mainstream classroom integration rate was significantly higher in the youngest group at 81% as compared to 57% and 63% for the middle and oldest groups, respectively (p<0.05) after six years of follow-up. After incorporating lifetime educational cost savings, cochlear implantation led to net societal savings of $31,252, $10,217, and $6,680 for the youngest, middle, and oldest groups at CI, respectively, over the child’s projected lifetime. Conclusions Even without considering improvements in lifetime earnings, the overall cost-utility results indicate highly favorable ratios. Early (<18 months) intervention with cochlear implantation was associated with greater and longer quality of life improvements, similar direct costs of implantation, and economically-valuable improved classroom placement, without a greater incidence of medical and surgical complications when compared to cochlear implantation at older ages.

This research demonstrates that variation exists across and within expenditure estimation methods applied to MEPS data. Despite concerns regarding aspects of reliability and consistency, reporting a combination of the four methods offers a degree of transparency and validity to estimating the likely range of annual direct medical expenditures of a condition.

Arguably, few factors will change the future face of the American health care workforce as widely and dramatically as health information technology (IT) and electronic health (e-health) applications. We explore how such applications designed for providers and patients will affect the future demand for physicians. We performed what we believe to be the most comprehensive review of the literature to date, including previously published systematic reviews and relevant individual studies. We estimate that if health IT were fully implemented in 30 percent of community-based physicians' offices, the demand for physicians would be reduced by about 4-9 percent. Delegation of care to nurse practitioners and physician assistants supported by health IT could reduce the future demand for physicians by 4-7 percent. Similarly, IT-supported delegation from specialist physicians to generalists could reduce the demand for specialists by 2-5 percent. The use of health IT could also help address regional shortages of physicians by potentially enabling 12 percent of care to be delivered remotely or asynchronously. These estimated impacts could more than double if comprehensive health IT systems were adopted by 70 percent of US ambulatory care delivery settings. Future predictions of physician supply adequacy should take these likely changes into account. M ost health policy analysts predict that the United States will experience a shortage of physicians as the population ages and many currently uninsured Americans obtain access to care with coverage provided through the Affordable Care Act.1-4 In addition to major changes in health care financing and organization, the transformation of the US health care system's digital infrastructure will be profound. In part because of the "meaningful use" provisions in the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act of 2009, as many as 72 percent of active office-based physicians already have an electronic health record (EHR) system on their desks. Only a decade ago the figure was about 10 percent. 5,6 It is likely that the majority of patients' interactions with the health care system will soon be digitally mediated. 7In this article we explore how providers' health information technology (IT) systems and electronic health (e-health) and mobile health (mhealth) applications for consumers will affect the future demand for physicians. Major questions include the following: Will digital communication between provider and consumer, including the use of e-mail and e-health self-management tools, decrease or increase the demand for physician services? How will an IT-supported workflow change providers' productivity? Will digital- This article does not fully answer these important questions. However, our analysis should help clarify the issues and advance the debate. We focus on the potential impact of IT and ehealth on the future demand for physicians. We do not focus on the important but separate issue of how clinicians should best be trained for their incre...

No abstract