e14524 Background: Immunogenic cell death (ICD) is known for the release of DAMPS from tumor cells. We aimed to find signals of ICD by assessing the variation of plasma DAMPS (HMGB1 and S100A8) after vs. before standard of care (SoC) systemic treatment in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Patients scheduled to start a new line of systemic treatment were included. Plasma concentrations of HMGB1 and S100A8 were measured (ng/mL) before and after three months of treatment. CD44 immunohistochemical (IHC) expression was determined in tumor tissue. After vs. before variation of paired median concentrations was analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for the whole population and selected subgroups according to RECIST response, baseline plasmatic iron levels, CD44 expression, and platinum-based treatment. Results: Fifty-two patients were included. The most frequent tumor sites were colorectal (35%) and lung (25%). Forty-two patients (81%) received this treatment as first-line. Thirty-six patients (69%) received chemotherapy (CT) alone, ten (19%) CT plus targeted therapy (7 FOLFOX or XELOX plus bevacizumab, and one each FOLFOX plus cetuximab, FOLFOX plus panitumumab, docetaxel-trastuzumab-pertuzumab), two (3.8%) carboplatin-pemetrexed-pembrolizumab, three (5.8%) pembrolizumab alone and one (1.9%) cetuximab alone. Overall response rate (RECIST) was 42%, rate of patients with low baseline plasmatic iron levels was 53%, and CD44 expression was positive in 35% of the patients. Results on plasma concentration of DAMPS are shown in the table. Conclusions: Signals of ICD were not observed in these patients. HMGB1 variation was not significant while plasma concentration of S100A8 significantly decreased after treatment, more markedly in those patients who experienced tumor response.[Table: see text]
Objective: The location of the primary tumor in colorectal cancer (CRC) could be a prognostic factor related to survival. However, its usefulness has not been sufficiently analyzed. The results in patients with tumors in initial stages are very limited, and there are descriptive parameters of survival that have not been analyzed in detail. In this study, the relationship between primary tumor location and survival in CRC patients was analyzed. Materials And Methods: This was a retrospective observational study. All patients treated consecutively for CRC between January 2005 and December 2019 in the same hospital center were included. Overall survival (OS), cancer-related survival (CRS), time to recurrence (TTR), relapse-free survival (RFS) and postrecurrence survival (PRS) were analyzed, and the results were classified by tumor stage. The results were compared among patients with right colon (RS), left colon (LS) and rectal tumors. Results: In the entire cohort, patients with RS tumors had lower OS and lower CRS at 60 months after diagnosis than did patients with LS or rectal tumors. In the regression analysis, the localization of the primary tumor was an independent prognostic indicator for OS and CRS. Analysis by tumor stage showed that patients with RS stage III tumors had lower OS and lower CRS at 60 months than did patients with LS and rectal tumors (42%, 59% and 53%, respectively, p = 0.006; and 48%, 63% and 57%, respectively, p = 0.025). Additionally, patients with RS Stage IV tumors had lower OS and lower CRS at 36 months than did patients with LS and rectal tumors (9%, 24%, 24%, respectively, p < 0.001; and 10%, 24% and 24%, respectively, p < 0.001). No differences were found in TTR and RFS among patients with stage I and II RS, LS, and rectal tumors. In contrast, patients with stage RS III tumors had significantly poorer PRS (9% for RS tumors, 13% for LS tumors, and 22% for rectal tumors) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The location of the primary tumor in patients with CRC is related to survival. The effect of laterality is more marked in patients with stage III and IV tumors. Patients with RS tumors had lower OS and CRS due to the lower survival of patients with stage IV RS tumors and lower PRS for patients with stage III tumors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.