Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS), is an emergent disease in Latin America (LATAM), which raises substantial socioeconomic challenges to a region where most countries remain as economies in development. Objective: To assess barriers to access and utilization of MS care services in a regional cohort survey. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study based on a self-reported survey. Patients with MS (PwMS) completed this regional survey in 12 Latin American (LATAM) countries. PwMS were also divided into those with healthcare insurance (including certain local national social security programs) and those without healthcare insurance (treated at public institutions). Results: We surveyed 1469 PwMS and identified significant regional differences in relation to access to complementary tests, rehabilitation services, and prescription of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Between 44.4% and 73.5% of PwMS were unemployed and nearly 50% had completed higher education. PwMS receiving care from the private sector reported greater access to imaging, DMTs, and fewer problems obtaining DMTs compared to those treated at public institutions. Multivariate analysis showed that lack of private insurance (OR = 2.21, p < 0.001), longer MS duration (OR = 1.02, p = 0.001), lower level of education (OR = 0.66, p = 0.009), and unemployment (OR = 0.73, p = 0.03) were independently associated with inappropriate delivery of DMTs. Conclusion: These findings suggest barriers to access and utilization of MS care services across LATAM are prevalent. We identified several factors predicting unmet healthcare needs in PwMS.

Background To date, there are no data available on the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in Latin American patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Objective Characterize safety of COVID-19 vaccines in Latin American (LATAM) patients with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS). Methods A cross-sectional study between February 1, 2021, and April 30, 2021. Individuals with MS from LATAM countries were invited to participate in a self-administered web-based survey, through MS patient organizations from the region. Results 393 vaccinated pwMS from 10 different Latin American countries were included. The vaccines administered were: inactivated virus vaccines (IVV) in 38.2% of patients, adenovirus vector vaccines (AdV) in 48.8% and mRNA vaccines 13%. All patients received at least one dose of any of the COVID-19 vaccines and 123 (31.3%) declared receiving a second dose. Mean (SD) age 41.5 (11.8) years, 82.4% female, MS disease duration: 8.4 (8.2) years. No serious adverse events were reported with any of the COVID-19 vaccines after either the first or second dose. A lower frequency of adverse events was found with IVV (22%) in comparison with AdV (46.4%) and mRNA (35.3%) ( p < 0.01). Five participants reported having an MS relapse after IVV first dose. Conclusion COVID-19 vaccines applied in LATAM proved safe for MS patients.

No abstract

The objective of the present study was to identify the frequency of MS patients in Latin America (LATAM) that received the influenza vaccine during the most recent season and the reasons related to non-vaccination. Cross-sectional study between November and December 2020 in a large cohort of MS patients from LATAM. Patients responded about recommendation of receiving influenza vaccine and the use of it as well as reasons for not using the vaccine. Four hundred twelve MS patients were included in the analysis. 47.3% of patients were recommended to receive the vaccine from the treating physician. Nearly 54% of patients did not receive the influenza vaccine, and the most frequent cause was that it was neither recommended nor mentioned by the treating physician (27.4%). Female gender (OR = 2.3, 95%CI 1.4–3.8, p = 0.001) was associated with an increased risk of recommendation, while a progressive form of MS and higher EDSS decreased the risk (OR = 0.49, 95%CI 0.27–0.90, p = 0.023; OR = 0.65, 95%CI 0.55–0.97, p = 0.02, respectively). Despite the evidence to recommend the influenza vaccine in MS patients, a limited number of patients in clinical practice received such recommendation. Supplementary information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13365-021-01011-w.

No abstract