Importance Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been employed within various multimodality strategies for the prevention and treatment of gastric cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis. Objective To systematically evaluate the role of HIPEC in gastric cancer and clarify its effectiveness at different stages of peritoneal disease progression. Data Sources Medline and Embase databases between January 1, 1985, and June 1, 2016. Study Selection Randomized control trials (RTC) and high-quality nonrandomized control trials (NRCTs) selected on a validated tool (Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies) comparing HIPEC and standard oncological management for the treatment of advanced stage gastric cancer with and without peritoneal carcinomatosis were considered. Data Extraction and Synthesis A random-effects network meta-analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were overall survival and disease recurrence. Secondary outcomes were overall complications, type of complications, and sites of recurrence. Results A total of 11 RCTs and 21 NRCTs (2520 patients) were included. For patients without the presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), the overall survival rates between the HIPEC and control groups at 3 or 5 years resulted in favor of the HIPEC group (RR=0.82, P=0.01). No difference in the 3-year overall survival (RR=0.99, P=0.85) in but a prolonged median survival of 4 months in favor of the HIPEC group (WMD=4.04, P<0.001) was seen in patients with PC. HIPEC was associated with significantly higher risk of complications for both patients with PC (RR=2.15, P<0.01) and without (RR=2.17, P<0.01). This increased risk in the HIPEC group was related to systemic drugs toxicity. Anastomotic leakage rates were found to be similar between groups. Conclusions and Relevance Our study demonstrates a survival advantage of the use of HIPEC as a prophylactic strategy and suggests that patients whose disease burden is limited to positive cytology and limited nodal involvement may benefit the most from HIPEC. For patients with extensive carcinomatosis, the completeness of cytoreductive surgery is a critical prognostic factor for survival. Future RCTs should better define patient selection criteria.

Colorectal cancer commonly metastasizes. The liver is the most frequent site of metastases and dominates the length of survival for this disease. As surgical and systemic therapies have become accepted and now are proven to be potentially curative, other sites of metastases have become more clinically relevant in terms of clinical symptoms and influence on survival. Treatment of extrahepatic metastases by surgical and ablative procedures is increasingly accepted and is proving to be effective at palliating symptoms, as well as life prolonging. In this review, we will first summarize key issues with metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver and available treatments. We will then discuss surgical and ablative treatments of other sites of disease including lung, lymph nodes, peritoneum, bone, and brain. Best available evidence for treatment strategies will be presented as well as potential new directions.

Cancer immunotherapy and the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors have markedly changed the treatment paradigm for many cancers. They function to disrupt cancer cell evasion of the immune response and activate sustained anti-tumor immunity. Oncolytic viruses have also emerged as an additional therapeutic agent for cancer treatment. These viruses are designed to target and kill tumor cells while leaving the normal cells unharmed. As part of this process, oncolytic virus infection stimulates anti-cancer immune responses that augment the efficacy of checkpoint inhibition. These viruses have the capability of transforming a "cold" tumor microenvironment with few immune effector cells into a "hot" environment with increased immune cell and cytokine infiltration. For this reason, there are multiple ongoing clinical trials that combine oncolytic virotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. This review will detail the key oncolytic viruses in preclinical and clinical studies and highlight the results of their testing with checkpoint inhibitors. CTLA-4 CTLA-4, also known as CD152, is an inhibitory molecule on the surface of activated T cells 12 that inhibits the binding of B7 to CD28. 13 Its mechanism functions to halt the initial stage of naive T cell activation in the lymph nodes and results in decreased T cell responses. 14 Anti-CTLA-4 antibodies are designed to block

Background: The extent of the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting response has varied globally. The European and African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (E-AHPBA), the premier representative body for practicing HPB surgeons in Europe and Africa, conducted this survey to assess the impact of COVID-19 on HPB surgery. Methods: An online survey was disseminated to all E-AHPBA members to assess the effects of the pandemic on unit capacity, management of HPB cancers, use of COVID-19 screening and other aspects of service delivery. Results: Overall, 145 (25%) members responded. Most units, particularly in COVID-high countries (>100,000 cases) reported insufficient critical care capacity and reduced HPB operating sessions compared to COVID-low countries. Delayed access to cancer surgery necessitated alternatives including increased neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer and colorectal liver metastases, and locoregional treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma. Other aspects of service delivery including COVID-19 screening and personal protective equipment varied between units and countries. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound adverse impact on the delivery of HPB cancer care across the continents of Europe and Africa. The findings illustrate the need for safe resumption of cancer surgery in a "new" normal world with screening of patients and staff for COVID-19.

Triple-negative breast cancer is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer and is difficult to treat. Breast cancer is considered to be poorly immunogenic and hence is less responsive to immunotherapies. We tested whether the oncolytic poxvirus CF33-hNIS-ΔF14.5 could modulate tumor immune microenvironment and make the tumors responsive to the immune checkpoint inhibitor anti-PD-L1. We found that virus infection causes the upregulation of PD-L1 levels on triple-negative breast cancer cells in vitro as well as in vivo in mice. In a mouse model of orthotopic triple-negative breast cancer, the virus was found to increase tumor infiltration by CD8+ T cells. Likewise, in mice treated with CF33-hNIS-ΔF14.5 high levels of proinflammatory cytokines IFNγ and IL-6 were found in the tumors but not in the serum. The levels of immune modulation were even higher in mice that were treated with a combination of the virus and anti-PD-L1 antibody. While CF33-hNIS-ΔF14.5 and anti-PD-L1 antibody failed to exert significant anti-tumor effect as a single agent, a combination of the two agents resulted in significant antitumor effect with 50% mice experiencing complete tumor regression when both agents were injected intra-tumorally. Furthermore, the 'cured' mice did not develop tumor after re-challenge with the same cancer cells suggesting that they developed immunity against those cancer cells. Taken together, our study shows that CF33-hNIS-ΔF14.5 favorably modulates tumor immune microenvironment in triplenegative breast cancer model making them responsive to the immune checkpoint inhibitor anti-PD-L1, and hence warrants further studies to determine the clinical applicability of this combination therapy.