IA/IgG therapy induces long-term reduction of negative inotropic antibodies. After 12 months, however, re-increase of negative inotropic antibodies cannot be excluded.

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disease with an unpredictable and sometimes fatal course while the underlying pathomechanism is still unclear. Reasons of the increasing hospitalization rate and mortality in the United States remain in dispute but incriminated are a number of distinct comorbidities and risk factors as well as the application of more aggressive therapeutic agents. Studies reflecting the recent development in central Europe are lacking. Our aim was to investigate the recent mortality and hospitalization rates as well as the underlying comorbidities of hospitalized sarcoidosis patients in Switzerland. In this longitudinal, nested case-control study, a nation-wide database provided by the Swiss Federal Office for Statistics enclosing every hospital entry covering the years 2002–2012 (n = 15,627,573) was analyzed. There were 8,385 cases with a diagnosis of sarcoidosis representing 0.054% (8,385 / 15,627,573) of all hospitalizations in Switzerland. These cases were compared with age- and sex-matched controls without the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Hospitalization and mortality rates in Switzerland remained stable over the observed time period. Comorbidity analysis revealed that sarcoidosis patients had significantly higher medication-related comorbidities compared to matched controls, probably due to systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive therapy. Sarcoidosis patients were also more frequently re-hospitalized (median annual hospitalization rate 0.28 [IQR 0.15-0.65] vs. 0.19 [IQR 0.13-0.36] per year; p < 0.001), had a longer hospital stay (6 [IQR 2-13] vs. 4 [IQR 1-8] days; p < 0.001), had more comorbidities (4 [IQR 2-7] vs. 2 [IQR 1-5]; p < 0.001), and had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality (2.6% [95% CI 2.3%-2.9%] vs. 1.8% [95% CI 1.5%-2.1%] (p < 0.001). A worse outcome was observed among sarcoidosis patients having co-occurrence of associated respiratory diseases. Moreover, age was an important risk factor for re-hospitalization.

Background The new 2018 pulmonary hypertension (PH) definition includes a lower mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) cut‐off (>20 mmHg rather than ≥25 mmHg) and the compulsory requirement of a pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) ≥3 Wood units (WU) to define precapillary PH. We assessed the clinical impact of the 2018 compared to the 2015 PH definition in aortic stenosis (AS) patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR). Methods Severe AS patients (n = 487) undergoing pre‐AVR right heart catheterization were classified according to the 2015 and 2018 definitions. Post‐AVR mortality (median follow‐up 44 months) was assessed. Results Based on the 2015 definition, 66 (13%) patients exhibited combined pre and postcapillary PH (CpcPH), 116 (24%) isolated post‐capillary PH (IpcPH), 28 (6%) precapillary PH, and 277 (57%) no PH at all. Overall, 52 (11%) patients were reclassified: 23 no PH into IpcPH; 8 no PH into precapillary PH; 20 precapillary PH into no PH; 1 CpcPH into IpcPH. By the 2015 definition, only CpcPH patients displayed increased mortality, whereas by the 2018 definition, precapillary PH patients also experienced higher mortality than those without PH. Among the PH definition components, PVR ≥3 WU was the strongest predictor of death (hazard ratio > 4). Conclusions In severe AS, a higher number of IpcPH patients are diagnosed by the 2018 definition, even though they have the same prognosis as those without PH. Patients with true precapillary PH are more accurately identified by the 2018 definition that includes a pulmonary vascular disease criterion, that is, PVR ≥3 WU, a strong mortality predictor.

Since experience with primary and secondary detoxification in severe flecainide intoxications is limited, 2 different cases of flecainide intoxications are reported. In the first case, with plasma concentrations of 6500 ng/ml (therapeutic range: 200-980 ng/ml), the patient survived with a pacemaker and catecholamine support. In the second case, hemoperfusion terminated the need for emergency resuscitation during the initial phase, but was unsuccessful 3 h later. Even with a lower plasma concentration the patient died. Both patients had rapid onset of symptoms due to the very good bioavailability of the drug. Although it may be a rare intoxication, it is dangerous because of its quick onset and its efficiency in altering the cardiac stability. We recommend the prophylactic use of a pacemaker and gastric suction. The usefulness of hemoperfusion has not yet been proven.

Objective: Members of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor superfamily play a major role in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. To elucidate the role of TNF receptors, in 53 relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients, we measured the TNF receptor 1 and receptor 2 (TNF-R1 and TNF-R2) mRNA levels in peripheral blood leukocytes in natural history (n = 27) and during administration of interferon (IFN) β-1a (n = 26). Methods: Every 3 months for the duration of 1 year peripheral blood leukocytes were investigated by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Every 6 months, MRI scans of the brain were analyzed semiquantitatively. Results: At baseline, clinical expanded disability status scale score and TNF-R1 mRNA level were correlated. In the therapy group, the difference between T2 lesion load at baseline and after 12 months correlated negatively with the difference between TNF-R1 mRNA level at baseline and after 12 months. Subcutaneously applied IFN β increased the amount of TNF-R1 mRNA, but partly decreased the amount of TNF-R2 mRNA in clinically and subclinically defined responders to therapy after 1 year compared to baseline. Conclusion: This result might support the notion that due to different signal transduction properties of both receptors in the natural course of multiple sclerosis, TNF-α signaling in leukocytes via TNF-R1 might be beneficial, but detrimental via proinflammatory TNF-R2: part of the therapeutic efficacy of current first-line standard therapy with IFN might be due to the modulation of signal transduction pathways.