Tumor-induced osteomalacia in the head and neck region remains a challenging diagnosis to manage. Literature pertaining to management and outcome details remains sparse. We describe two cohorts: cohort 1 included seven patients from a single center in Western India with tumors located in paranasal sinuses (n = 3), intracranial (n = 2) and maxilla (n = 2). The unique features from our series is the management of persistent disease with radiation therapy (n = 2) and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) (n = 1). Cohort two has 163 patients identified from 109 publications for systematic review. Paranasal sinuses, mandible, intracranial disease, maxilla and oral cavity, in descending order, are reportedly common tumor sites. Within this cohort, mean age was 46 ± 14 years at presentation with 44.1% having local symptoms. Duration of symptoms varied from 1 to 240 months. Pre-surgery mean serum phosphorus was 1.4 ± 0.4 mg/dL and median FGF-23 levels were 3.6 (IQR:1.8–6.8) times of normal upper limit of normal. Majority (97.5%) were managed primarily with surgical excision; however, primary radiotherapy (n = 2) and surgery combined with radiotherapy (n = 2) were also reported. Twenty patients had persistent disease while nine patients had recurrence, more commonly noted with intracranial and oral cavity tumors. Surgery was the most common second mode of treatment employed succeeded by radiotherapy. Four patients had metastatic disease. The most common histopathological diagnosis reported is PMT mixed connective tissue, while the newer terminology ‘PMT mixed epithelial and connective tissue type’ has been described in 15 patients.
We propose that percentage arterial enhancement can be used as an objective radiological index for accurate identification of parathyroid adenoma/hyperplasia.
Background
Parathyroid carcinoma (PC) requires preoperative prediction for appropriate surgical management. Differentiation from symptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism (sPHPT) cohort is difficult.
Methods
Patients with sPHPT from a tertiary‐care center, Western India, including Cohort‐A (n = 19 [10/M; 9/F]) with PC and Cohort‐B (n = 93 [33/M; 60/F] with benign parathyroid lesions) were compared to derive predictors for differential diagnosis.
Results
There were no differences in clinical or biochemical parameters between the two cohorts. Comparison of CECT parameters showed that irregular shape, tumor heterogeneity, infiltration, short/long‐axis ratio >0.76, and long‐diameter >30 mm had high negative‐predictive value and intratumoral calcification had 100% positive‐predictive value to diagnose PC; whereas there were no differences in contrast‐enhancement patterns. Long diameter, short/long‐axis ratio, and heterogeneity were significant predictors on multivariate analysis.
Conclusion
It is difficult to predict diagnosis of PC in an Indian sPHPT cohort based on clinical and biochemical parameters, whereas CECT parathyroid‐based parameters can aid in diagnosis.
Background: Parathyroid lesions are identified by subjective enhancement and washout patterns on computed tomography (CT). We have previously proposed "percentage arterial enhancement" (PAE) as an objective index and now aim to validate its performance prospectively.Methods: Dual-phase CT was performed in 40 consecutive primary hyperparathyroidism patients. PAE was calculated as [{arterial phase Hounsfield unit (HU)-unenhanced phase HU}/unenhanced phase HU] Â 100. PAE > 128.9% was considered parathyroid.Results: PAE had 94.2% sensitivity, 100% positive predictive value (PPV) in lateralization, and sensitivity and PPV of 93.9% in quadrant localization of singlegland disease. PAE failed to identify two lesions: an intrathyroidal parathyroid carcinoma in the background of multinodular goiter and another lower enhancing cystic parathyroid adenoma. PAE had 60% sensitivity, and 100% PPV to identify multigland disease. The mean effective dose was 2.74 mSV.Conclusions: PAE is a specific CT index for parathyroid lesions with less radiation exposure. Areas of caution include intrathyroidal and cystic lesions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.