Background
Fatigued skin, defined as dehydrated skin with lack of visual facial firmness and dull appearance, can be attributed to intrinsic and extrinsic factors of aging. An anti‐aging daily serum (AADS) containing a unique sunflower sprout extract (SSE) was formulated to target fatigued and photodamaged skin.
Aims
Utilizing both preclinical and clinical testing models, the efficacy of the AADS was investigated to improve fatigued and photodamaged skin.
Patients/Method
Preclinical studies included in vitro analysis of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production in fatigued dermal fibroblasts, inhibition of ultraviolet radiation A (UVA) induced advanced glycation end products (AGEs) in keratinocytes, and ex vivo gene expression after incubation with the SSE. An institutional review board (IRB)‐approved short‐term, 7‐day, clinical case study was conducted on 28 female subjects, Fitzpatrick skin type I–IV, aged 30–60 years with moderate overall photodamage and skin fatigue. This was a double‐blinded, randomized, controlled, single‐center case study testing the AADS alone and in combination with an anti‐aging facial moisturizer (AAFM).
Results
The SSE boosted intracellular ATP production in fatigued fibroblasts and reduced the formation of AGEs in keratinocytes. The SSE increased expression of genes related to epidermal keratinization and downregulated genes related to inflammation. Statistically significant improvement was found after 7 days of twice‐daily use of the AADS alone and in combination with the AAFM. Products were well tolerated and perceived by subjects.
Conclusion
Preclinical results combined with the clinical results strongly suggest that the AADS containing the SSE was tolerable and effective in targeting fatigued and photodamaged skin.
Background: Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. are the most common organisms causing urinary tract infection (UTI) and commonly responsible for extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) production. This study was carried out to detect ESBL producing uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. by phenotypic and genotypic method. Rapid and accurate detection of ESBL producing E. coli and Klebsiella spp. has an important role to avoid treatment failure. Materials and Methods: This was a cross sectional observational study and carried out in department of microbiology in Chittagong Medical College, Bangladesh from January to December 2017. Urine was collected from suspected UTI patients and standard microbiological and biochemical tests were carried out. ESBL producing E. coli and Klebsiella spp. were identified by phenotypic confirmatory disc diffusion test (PCDDT). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed by using standard protocol with specific primers. Results: 448 urine samples were collected. Among them, 140 showed bacterial growth; 72 were E. coli and 35 were Klebsiella spp. Among E. coli 38(52.8%) and in Klebsiella spp. 15(42.9%) were detected as ESBL producers by PCDDT respectively. Among E. coli, 41(56.9%) and in Klebsiella spp. 21(60%) strains produced ESBL genes by PCR. Out of 38 phenotypically positive E. coli, 7 strains do not carry any detectable genes. Similarly, out of 15 phenotypically positive Klebliella spp. 3 isolates did not produce any detectable gene. On the other hand, 10 E. coli isolates and 9 Klebsiella spp. carry detectable genes although these were not phenotypically ESBL producers. Moreover, ESBL producing E. coli and Klebsiella spp. showed more multidrug resistant than Non-ESBL producing E. coli and Klebsiella spp. Conclusion: This study revealed that large portion of E. coli and Klebsiella spp. was ESBL producers. PCR can detect some additional cases of ESBL producing isolates. So, PCR can be used along with phenotypic ......
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.