Tidung Island has the potential for the development of marine tourism area. Since 2009, the number of tourists visiting the area has been increasing every year. Without proper management, however, this condition might harm the surrounding ecosystem. This study aims to determine the suitability and carrying capacity of coastal tourism area in Tidung Island, Kepulauan Seribu. This study used the analyses of coastal tourism suitability index and carrying capacity of coastal area. The results showed the suitability index of the research locations was 94.05% with the carrying capacity of 180 tourists per day for the first location; the second location was 89.28% with the carrying capacity of 300 tourists per day; and for the third location was 94.05% with the carrying capacity of 60 tourists per day. The three research sites are categorized into very suitable in terms of the suitability as tourism spots.

The sustainability of capture fisheries management is determined by the relationship between important dimensions such as ecological, socio-economic, technological, as well as legal and institutional dimensions. Sustainability in capture fisheries management has urgency in the lives of fishing communities, the interests of the state as well as in the framework of sustainable development including in meeting consumption needs at various levels of society. This study aims to: 1) Determine the status of capture fisheries through the Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) approach. 2) Analyze policies to support capture fisheries at the research site. Data was collected through direct interviews with respondents through questionnaires. The data collected is data on ecological, socio-economic, technological, legal and institutional aspects. This research method uses a Multi-dimensional Scaling (MDS) approach on the ecological, socio-economic, technological, legal and institutional dimensions with the Rapfish technique. The results of the analysis of sustainable capture fisheries management in the city of Tegal based on five main dimensions were obtained for the Ecological dimension of 40.25% (less sustainable), the Economic dimension of 54.96% (Moderately sustainable), the Social dimension of 10% (Enough sustainable sustainable), ), the Technological Dimension of 51.20% (Moderately sustainable), and the Institutional dimension of 50.03% (Moderately Sustainable).

No abstract