No abstract

Background: Anticoagulation therapy is recommended for stroke prevention in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to estimate the time to switch from warfarin to a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and identify the factors associated with it. Methods: By using claims data, we studied 7111 warfarin-using patients with nonvalvular AF who were aged ≥65 years. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate the time to switch from warfarin to a DOAC, and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to estimate the influencing factors. Results: Approximately one-third of the patients (2403, 33.8%) switched from warfarin to a DOAC during the study period. Female sex, aged between 75 and 79 years, having a Medical Aid or Patriots and Veterans Insurance, hypertension, and history of prior stroke, and transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism (prior stroke/TIA/TE) were associated with a significantly shorter time to switch. The odds of switching to a DOAC were increased by approximately 1.2-fold in the women and 1.4-fold in the patients with prior stroke/TIA/TE. Conclusions: Approximately one-third of the warfarin-using patients switched from warfarin to a DOAC within 6 months after the change in the DOAC reimbursement criteria. In the Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, the factors that affected anticoagulant switching from warfarin to a DOAC were female sex and history of prior stroke/TIA/TE.

Background Regdanvimab has decreased the time to clinical recovery from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and lowered the rate of oxygen therapy according to the results from phase 2/3 randomized controlled trial. More information is needed about the effects and safety of regdanvimab. Methods We analyzed data for patients with high-risk mild or moderate COVID-19 being admitted to Busan Medical Center between December 1, 2020 and April 16, 2021. A propensity score (PS) matched analysis was conducted to compare patients treated with and without regdanvimab. The primary outcome was in-hospital death or disease aggravation which means the need for oxygen therapy (low- or high-flow oxygen therapy and mechanical ventilation) and secondary outcomes comprised the length of hospital stay and adverse reactions. Results Among 1,617 selected patients, 970 (60.0%) were indicated for regdanvimab. Of these, 377 (38.9%) were administered with regdanvimab. Among a 1:1 PS-matched cohort of 377 patients each treated with and without regdanvimab, 19 (5%) and 81 (21.5%) reached the composite outcome of death, or disease aggravation, respectively (absolute risk difference, −16.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], −21.1, −11.7; relative risk difference, 76.5%; P < 0.001). Regdanvimab significantly reduced the composite outcome of death, or disease aggravation in univariate (odds ratio [OR], 0.194; 95% CI, 0.112–0.320; P < 0.001) and multivariable-adjusted analyses (OR, 0.169; 95% CI, 0.095–0.289; P < 0.001). The hospital stay was shorter for the group with than without regdanvimab. Some hematological adverse reactions were more frequent in the group without regdanvimab, but other adverse reactions did not significantly differ between the groups. Conclusion Regdanvimab was associated with a significantly lower risk of disease aggravation without increasing adverse reactions.

Regdanvimab has decreased the time to clinical recovery from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and lowered the rate of oxygen therapy according to the results from Phase 2 randomized controlled trial. More information is needed about the effects and safety of regdanvimab. We analyzed the medical records of patients with high-risk mild or moderate COVID-19 being admitted to Busan Medical Center between December 1, 2020, and April 16, 2021. A propensity score (PS) matched analysis was conducted to compare patients with and without regdanvimab. The primary outcome was in-hospital death or disease aggravation. Among 1,617 selected patients, 970 (60.0%) were indicated for regdanvimab. Among a 1:1 PS-matched cohort of 377 patients each treated with and without regdanvimab, regdanvimab significantly reduced the primary endpoint (odds ratio [OR], 0.194; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.112–0.320; p < 0.001). Regdanvimab was associated with a significantly lower risk of disease aggravation without increasing adverse reactions.

Background Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are preferred over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) as oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). This study aimed to estimate the current status and risk factors of OAC underutilization in the NOAC era. Method A cross-sectional study using nationwide claims data was conducted. Elderly patients with NVAF at an increased risk of stroke were selected as candidates for OAC therapy before the index date (July 1, 2018). The status of anticoagulant utilization on the index date and factors influencing the use of anticoagulants was investigated in these patients. Results Of the 11,056 patients with NVAF who were eligible for OAC therapy, 7238 (65.5%) were receiving OAC on the index date, and 6302 (87.1%) were receiving NOACs. Patients aged ≥ 75 years had higher anticoagulant utilization than those aged 65–69 years. Among comorbid diseases, while hypertension was the most influential positive factor (odds ratio [OR] = 1.644; confidence interval [CI] = 1.445–1.869) in OAC utilization, severe renal disease was the most influential negative factor (OR = 0.289; CI = 0.200–0.416). Aspirin use had a significantly low OR (OR = 0.097; CI = 0.085–0.110) of anticoagulant use. OAC use was approximately 1.5 times higher in patients with persistent or permanent AF than in those with paroxysmal AF. Conclusion Approximately one-third of patients who are recommended anticoagulation therapy do not take OACs, even though the use of NOACs has become more common. It should be widely recognized that aspirin cannot be an alternative to OACs, and anticoagulant therapy should be actively implemented.