Purpose:To analyze the phenotype of the corneal epithelium in patients with long-term follow-up who underwent autologous cultivated oral mucosal epithelial transplantation (COMET) using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) and impression cytology with immunofluorescence staining (ICIF).Methods: Thirteen eyes from patients with severe limbal stem cell deficiency, who underwent COMET at least 48 months before, were recruited in this noncomparative cohort study. After eye examination, IVCM and ICIF were performed. Clinical manifestations of the cornea were evaluated and compared with epithelial findings detected by IVCM and ICIF [cytokeratin (CK) 3, CK7, and CK12]. Two corneal buttons derived from patients receiving the corneal transplantation post-COMET were sent for immunohistochemistry (CK3, CK6, CK7, CK12, paired box gene 6, p63, zonula occludens-1, and integrin b -1). Results:The mean age of patients was 51.2 6 20.6 years, and the mean follow-up time since COMET was 78.7 6 16.3 months. Six of 13 eyes showed clinically successful COMET. In these eyes, IVCM demonstrated predominant cornea-like epithelium and ICIF reported positivity for CK3 and CK12, confirming the presence of oral mucosal and corneal epithelium. Meanwhile, 7 eyes showed total conjunctiv-alization, corresponding with substantial conjunctival epithelium detected by IVCM and positivity for conjunctival (CK7) and oral mucosal epithelial (CK3) markers detected by ICIF. The immunohistochemistry of corneal buttons stained positive for oral mucosal, corneal epithelial, and stem cell markers (CK3, CK12, and p63). Conclusions:In long-term follow-up of COMET, epithelium of successful patients demonstrated cornea-like phenotype, whereas failed cases revealed mainly conjunctival phenotype. However, there were evidences that oral mucosal epithelial cells remained across the cornea in both successful and failed COMET as detected by IVCM and ICIF.
Simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET) and cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation (CLET) are proven techniques for treating limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD). However, the precise regions that are most suitable for preparing explants for transplantation have not been identified conclusively. Accordingly, this in vitro study aimed at determining ideal sites to be selected for tissue harvest for limbal stem cell culture and transplantation. We evaluated cell outgrowth potential and the expression of stem cell markers in cultures from 48 limbal explants from five cadaveric donors. The limbal explants were generated from the three specific sites: Lcor (located innermost and adjacent to the cornea), Lm (middle limbus), and Lconj (located outermost adjacent to the conjunctiva). We found that explants from the Lconj and Lm sites exhibited higher growth potential than those from the Lcor site. Transcript encoding the stem cell marker and p63 isoform, ΔNp63, was detected in cells from Lm and Lconj explants; expression levels were slightly, though significantly (p-value < 0.05), higher in Lm than in Lconj, although expression of ΔNp63α protein was similar in cells from all explants. Differential expression of ATP-Binding Cassette Subfamily G Member 2 (ABCG2) did not reach statistical significance. Immunohistochemistry by indirect immunofluorescence analysis of limbus tissue revealed that the basal layer in explant tissue from Lconj and Lm contained markedly more stem cells than found in Lcor explant tissue; these findings correlate with a higher capacity for growth. Collectively, our findings suggest that explants from the Lconj and Lm sites should be selected for limbal cell expansion for both CLET and SLET procedures. These new insights may guide surgeons toward specific limbal sites that are most suitable for stem cell culture and transplantation and may ultimately improve treatment outcomes in the patients with LSCD.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.