Diffusion Weighted MRI is a promising technique for diagnosis of liver fibrosis. Apparent Diffusion Coefficients provide valuable information for staging of liver fibrosis. DWI may offer alternative to biopsy for assessing liver fibrosis.

Summary Background Results are conflicting with respect to the renal effects of anti‐viral agents used for hepatitis B virus infection. Aim To compare short and long‐term renal effects in real‐life settings and to determine risk factors for renal impairment during treatment. Methods 2221 treatment‐naïve patients were enrolled. Among these, 895 (302 lamivudine, 27 telbivudine, 282 entecavir, 273 tenofovir and 11 adefovir initiated patients) had ‘repeated measures’ of creatinine (baseline, 1st, 6th, 12th and 24th month of treatment). Telbivudine and adefovir groups were excluded from further analysis because of the low number of patients. We calculated the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula at each time point. Hypophosphataemia was also recorded. Risk factors for renal impairment were analysed. Results Tenofovir caused a decline in GFR at each time point when compared to baseline levels. However, lamivudine and entecavir did not change GFR. GFR‐shifting from ≥90 to 60–89 mL/min/1.73 m2 was comparable among groups. The proportion of patients whose baseline creatinine increased more than 25% was comparable among all anti‐virals. GFR showed a decline in patients who switched from entecavir to tenofovir. One patient with compensated cirrhosis needed to change from tenofovir because of renal safety. Seven and three patients developed transient hypophosphataemia in the tenofovir and lamivudine groups, respectively. Conclusions Although tenofovir caused a decline in GFR, differences between the anti‐viral agents do not appear to be so impressive. In patients with and without renal risk factors at baseline, there is no impact of anti‐virals, including tenofovir.

We evaluated the efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in patients with lamivudine failure (LAM-F) in comparison with that in nucleoside/nucleotide analogue (NA)-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). The criteria for inclusion were being NA naïve or having previous LAM-F and receiving TDF therapy for at least 6 months. Biochemical and virological tests were performed at the baseline, at 3-month intervals in the first year, and every 6 months thereafter. The primary outcome measure for efficacy was a complete virological response (CVR), defined as an HBV DNA level of <20 IU/ml. CVR rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and a multivariate Cox proportional-hazard model was generated in order to find predictive factors independently associated with the time to a CVR. We included 197 patients in the study (136 males; mean age, 43 ؎ 12 years; 105 patients were NA naïve). Sixty-five patients had hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive CHB. The median duration of TDF treatment was 29 (range, 6 to 52) months. Seventy-one patients (77%) in the LAM-F group were treated with TDF add-on therapy. The CVR rates of the NA-naïve and LAM-F groups were comparable in HBeAg-negative (94% versus 96% at month 36, P ‫؍‬

Significant liver damage was detected in 40% of CHB patients with PNALT and high HBV DNA upon biopsy. Age and HBV DNA viral load were independent predictors of significant liver damage. A biopsy to determine the degree of liver damage is advisable for CHB patients older than 46 years.

Introduction. Infectious diseases may present with atypical presentations in the geriatric patients. While fever is an important finding of infections, it may also be a sign of noninfectious etiology. Methods. Geriatric patients who were hospitalized for acute fever in our infectious diseases unit were included. Acute fever was defined as presentation within the first week of fever above 37.3°C. Results. 185 patients were included (82 males and 103 females). Mean age was 69.7 ± 7.5 years. The cause of fever was an infectious disease in 135 and noninfectious disease in 32 and unknown in 18 of the patients. The most common infectious etiologies were respiratory tract infections (n = 46), urinary tract infections (n = 26), and skin and soft tissue infections (n = 23). Noninfectious causes of fever were rheumatic diseases (n = 8), solid tumors (n = 7), hematological diseases (n = 10), and vasculitis (n = 7). A noninfectious cause of fever was present in one patient with no underlying diseases and in 31 of 130 patients with underlying diseases. Conclusion. Geriatric patients with no underlying diseases generally had infectious causes of fever while noninfectious causes were responsible from fever in an important proportion of patients with underlying diseases.