Background The link between use of solid biomass fuel (wood, charcoal, coal, dung, and crop residues) for cooking and/or heating and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is inconclusive. Objective We systematically reviewed the literature and performed a meta-analysis to determine whether cooking fuel type influences esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Knowledge and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for studies investigating cooking fuel and ESCC from 2000 until March 2019. We performed random effects meta-analysis stratified by the continent, World Bank’s country income classifications and fuel type and calculated pooled odds ratios and 95% CIs for the risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in biomass fuel users compared with non-users. Results Our analysis included 16 studies (all case-control) with 16,189 participants (5233 cases and 10,956 controls) that compared risk of ESCC among those using nonsolid fuels and biomass fuels. We found use of biomass fuel was associated with Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with a pooled odds ratio (OR) 3.02 (95% CI 2.22, 4.11, heterogeneity (I 2 ) = 79%). In sub-group analyses by continent, Africa (OR 3.35, 95%CI 2.34, 4.80, I 2 = 73.4%) and Asia (OR 3.08, 95%CI 1.27, 7.43, I 2 = 81.7%) had the highest odds of ESCC. Use of wood as fuel had the highest odds of 3.90, 95% CI 2.25, 6.77, I 2 = 63.5%). No significant publication bias was detected. Conclusions Biomass fuel is associated with increased risk of Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Biomass fuel status should be considered in the risk assessment for Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12940-019-0496-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
BackgroundThe health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important treatment goal that could serve as low-cost prognostication tool in resource poor settings.We sought to validate the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and evaluate its use as a predictor of 3 months all-cause mortality among heart failure participants in rural Uganda.MethodsThe Mbarara Heart Failure Registry Cohort study observes heart failure patients during hospital stay and in the community in rural Uganda. Participants completed health failure evaluations and HRQoL questionnaires at enrollment, 1 and 3 months of follow-up. We used Cronbach’s alpha coefficients to define internal consistency, intraclass correlation coefficients as a reliability coefficient, and Cox proportional hazard models to predict the risk of 3 months all-cause mortality.ResultsAmong the 195 participants who completed HRQoL questionnaires, the mean age was 52 (standard deviation (SD) 21.4) years, 68% were women and 29% reported history of hypertension. The KCCQ had excellent internal consistency (87% Cronbach alpha) but poor reliability. Independent predictors of all-cause mortality within 3 months included: worse overall KCCQ score (Adjusted Hazard ratio (AHR) 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1, 8.1), highest asset ownership (AHR 3.6, 95% CI 1.2, 10.8), alcoholic drinks per sitting (AHR per 1 drink 1.4, 95% CI 1.0, 1.9), New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class IV heart failure (AHR 2.6, 95% CI 1.3, 5.4), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 30 to 59 ml/min/1.73 m2 (AHR 3.4, 95% CI 1.1, 10.8), and eGFR less than 15 ml/min/1.73 m2 (AHR 2.7, 95% CI 1.0, 7.1), each 1 pg/mL increase in Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) (AHR, 1.0, 95% CI 1.0, 1.0), and each 1 ng/mL increase in Creatine-Kinase MB isomer (CKMB) (AHR 1.0, 95% CI 1.0, 1.1).ConclusionThe KCCQ showed excellent internal consistency. Worse overall KCCQ score, highest asset ownership, increasing alcoholic drink per sitting, NYHA class IV, decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate, BNP, and CKMB predicted all-cause mortality at 3 months. The KCCQ could be an additional low-cost tool to aid in the prognostication of acute heart failure patients.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12872-018-0959-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
There is a high incidence of all-cause mortality occurring in-hospital among patients hospitalized with heart failure in rural Uganda. Heart failure directed therapies should be instituted to curb heart failure-related mortality.
Background: Little is known about the survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer in resource limited settings.Objectives: We sought to determine the incidence of one-year all-cause mortality and age-standardized mortality rates for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Uganda.Methods: Prospective cohort of 92 participants with histologically confirmed esophageal squamous cell cancer at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital, southwestern Uganda. Participants were enrolled between January 2018 and March 2020 and followed until death. We used Kaplan-Meier methods to determine all-cause mortality and median survival time; Cox regression to determine predictors of survival; and determined age-standardized mortality rates (SMR) using the WHO standard population. Results: All 92 participants contributed a total 353.8 months at risk, 89 (96.7%) died representing an incidence rate of 251.5 (95% CI 204.3, 309.6) per 1000 person-months. The difference in the one-year risk of all-cause mortality among men and women was negative 6.4 percentage points. The overall SMR was 9.96 (95%CI 7.63, 12.29) per 100,000 and median survival time was 3.03 (95% CI 2.60, 3.47), shortest (1.77 months) among men younger than 45 and longest (7.77 months) among women aged 75 years or greater. In a fully adjusted model, high socioeconomic status predicted longer survival while increasing age and low socioeconomic status predicted shorter survival.Conclusion: After diagnosis, the one-year incidence rates of all-cause mortality and age-standardized mortality rates among ESCC patients in rural Uganda are high. Initiatives to improve access to oncology care for diagnosis and treatment should be prioritized to improve overall survival.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.