Purpose
Little is published in the literature about medication adherence rates among patients who are medically indigent and patients receiving primary care from nurse practitioners (NPs). This project examined adherence rates and barriers to adherence among patients at an NP‐managed health clinic (NPMC).
Data sources
The setting for this research was an NPMC for uninsured and low‐income patients. A cross‐sectional convenience sample of patients (n = 119) completed surveys eliciting demographic information, self‐report of medication adherence, health literacy, and barriers to adherence.
Conclusions
Analysis of subjects demonstrated a vulnerable population, yet the mean adherence rate was surprisingly high (77%), compared to the rate usually cited in published literature. The best predictive model differentiating patients with high adherence from those with low adherence combined the total number of reported barriers, health literacy, and employment status. The barriers most frequently cited by subjects were difficulty paying for medications, and difficulty reading and understanding written prescription labels, which was particularly prevalent among Spanish‐speaking patients.
Implications for practice
Clinic efforts to improve patient access to affordable medications may have contributed to subjects’ high rates of adherence. These efforts included helping patients with filling out prescription assistance program paperwork, prescribing generic medications, providing samples, and providing effective patient education.
ObjectiveTo evaluate whether Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean (ERAC) pathways reduces inpatient and outpatient opioid use, pain scores and improves the indicators of postoperative recovery.Study designThis is a prospective cohort study of all patients older than 18 undergoing an uncomplicated cesarean delivery (CD) at an academic medical center. We excluded complicated CD, patients with chronic pain disorders, chronic opioid use, acute postpartum depression, or mothers whose neonate demised before their discharge. Lastly, we excluded non-English and non-Spanish speaking patients. Our study compared the outcomes in patients before (pre-ERAC) and after (post-ERAC) implementation of an ERAC pathways. Primary outcomes were inpatient morphine milligram equivalent (MME) use and the patient’s delta pain scores. Secondary outcomes were outpatient MME prescriptions as well as indicators of postoperative recovery.ResultsOf 308 patients undergoing CD from October 2019 to September 2020, 196 were enrolled in the pre-ERAC cohort and 112 in the post-ERAC cohort. Patients in the post-ERAC cohort were less likely to require opioids in the postoperative period compared to the pre-ERAC cohort (35.7% vs. 18.4%, p<0.001). In addition, there was a significant reduction in the MME per stay in this cohort [16.8 MME (11.2-33.9) vs. 30 MME (20-49), p<0.001]. In the post-ERAC cohort, there was also a reduction in the number of patients who required prescribed opioids at the time of discharge (86.6 vs. 98%, p<0.001) as well as in the amount of MMEs prescribed [150 MME (112-150) vs. 150 MME (150-225), p<0.001; different shape of distribution]. Patients in the post-ERAC cohort had lower delta pain scores [2.2 (1.3-3.7) vs. 3.3 (2.3-4.7), p<0.001].ConclusionOur study has illustrated that our ERAC pathways reduced inpatient and outpatient opioid use as well as patient-reported pain scores while improving indicators of postoperative recovery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.