In order to explain the potent antihypertensive activity of the modestly active (IC50 = 3.2 microM) dihydropyrimidine calcium channel blocker 5, we carried out drug metabolism studies in the rat and found 5 is metabolized to compounds 6-10. Two of the metabolites, 6 (IC50 = 16 nM) and 7 (IC50 = 12 nM), were found to be responsible for the antihypertensive activity of compound 5. Potential metabolism of 6 into 7 in vivo precluded our interest in pursuing compounds related to 6. Structure-activity studies aimed at identifying additional aryl-substituted analogues of 7 led to 17g,j,p with comparable potential in vivo, though these compounds were less potent than 7 in vitro. To investigate the effects of absolute stereochemistry on potency, we resolved 7 via diastereomeric ureas 19a,b, prepared from 18 by treatment with (R)-alpha-methylbenzylamine. Our results demonstrate that the active R-(-)-enantiomer 20a of 7 is both more potent and longer acting than nifedipine (1) as an antihypertensive agent in the SHR. The in vivo potency and duration of 20a is comparable to the long-acting dihydropyridine amlodipine. The superior oral antihypertensive activity of 20a compared to that of previously described carbamates 2 (R2 = COOEt) could be explained by its improved oral bioavailability, possibly resulting from increased stability of the urea functionality.

We have examined a series of novel dihydropyrimidine calcium channel blockers that contain a basic group attached to either C5 or N3 of the heterocyclic ring. Structure-activity studies show that a 1-(phenylmethyl)-4-piperidinyl carbamate moiety at N3 and sulfur at C2 are optimal for vasorelaxant activity in vitro and impart potent and long-acting antihypertensive activity in vivo. One of these compounds (11) was identified as a lead, and the individual enantiomers 12a (R) and 12b (S) were synthesized. Two key steps of the synthesis were (1) the efficient separation of the diastereomeric ureido derivatives 29a/29b and (2) the high-yield transformation of 2-methoxy intermediates 30a/30b to the (p-methoxybenzyl)thio intermediates 31a/31b. Chirality was demonstrated to be a significant determinant of biological activity, with the dihydropyridine receptor recognizing the enamino ester moiety (12a) but not the carbamate moiety (12b). Dihydropyrimidine 12a is equipotent to nifedipine and amlodipine in vitro. In the spontaneously hypertensive rat, dihydropyrimidine 12a is both more potent and longer acting than nifedipine and compares most favorably with the long-acting dihydropyridine derivative amlodipine. Dihydropyrimidine 12a has the potential advantage of being a single enantiomer.

No abstract

2-Heterosubstituted-4-aryl-1,4-dihydro-6-methyl-5-pyrimidinecar box ylic acid esters 8, which lack the potential CS symmetry of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, were prepared and evaluated for biological activity. Biological assays using potassium-depolarized rabbit aorta and radioligand binding techniques showed that some of these compounds are potent mimics of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers. The combination of a branched ester (e.g. isopropyl, sec-butyl) and an alkylthio group (e.g. SMe) was found to be optimal for biological activity. When compared directly with similarly substituted 2-heteroalkyldihydropyridines 9, dihydropyrimidines 8 were found to be 30-fold less active. The solid-state structure of dihydropyrimidine analogue 8g shows that these compounds can adopt a molecular conformation which is similar to the reported conformation of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers.

To enhance the intrinsic potency of dihydropyrimidine calcium channel blockers, we have modified the structure of previously described 2-heteroalkyl-1,4-dihydropyrimidines 2 to 3-substituted 1,4-dihydropyrimidines 3. Structure-activity studies using potassium-depolarized rabbit aorta show that ortho, meta-disubstituted aryl derivatives are more potent than either ortho- or meta-monosubstituted compounds. While vasorelaxant activity was critically dependent on the size of the C5 ester group, isopropyl ester being the best, a variety of substituents (carbamate, acyl, sulfonyl, alkyl) were tolerated at N3. Our results show dihydropyrimidines 3 are significantly more potent than corresponding 2-heteroalkyl-1,4-dihydropyrimidines 2 and only slightly less potent than similarly substituted 2-heteroalkyl-1,4-dihydropyridines 4 and 5. Whereas dihydropyridine enantiomers usually show 10-15-fold difference in activity, the enantiomers of dihydropyrimidine 3j show more than a 1000-fold difference in activity. These results strengthen the requirement of an enamino ester for binding to the dihydropyridine receptor and indicate a nonspecific role for the N3-substituent.