The sensory nervous system in the vertebrate head arises from two different cell populations: neural crest and placodal cells. By contrast, in the trunk it originates from neural crest only. How do placode precursors become restricted exclusively to the head and how do multipotent ectodermal cells make the decision to become placodes or neural crest? At neural plate stages,future placode cells are confined to a narrow band in the head ectoderm, the pre-placodal region (PPR). Here, we identify the head mesoderm as the source of PPR inducing signals, reinforced by factors from the neural plate. We show that several independent signals are needed: attenuation of BMP and WNT is required for PPR formation. Together with activation of the FGF pathway, BMP and WNT antagonists can induce the PPR in naïve ectoderm. We also show that WNT signalling plays a crucial role in restricting placode formation to the head. Finally, we demonstrate that the decision of multipotent cells to become placode or neural crest precursors is mediated by WNT proteins:activation of the WNT pathway promotes the generation of neural crest at the expense of placodes. This mechanism explains how the placode territory becomes confined to the head, and how neural crest and placode fates diversify.

In vertebrates, cranial placodes form crucial parts of the sensory nervous system in the head. All cranial placodes arise from a common territory, the preplacodal region, and are identified by the expression of Six1/4 and Eya1/2 genes, which control different aspects of sensory development in invertebrates as well as vertebrates. While So and Eya can induce ectopic eyes in Drosophila, the ability of their vertebrate homologues to induce placodes in non-placodal ectoderm has not been explored. Here we show that Six1 and Eya2 are involved in ectodermal patterning and cooperate to induce preplacodal gene expression, while repressing neural plate and neural crest fates. However, they are not sufficient to induce ectopic sensory placodes in future epidermis. Activation of Six1 target genes is required for expression of preplacodal genes, for normal placode morphology and for placode-specific Pax protein expression. These findings suggest that unlike in the fly where the Pax6 homologue Eyeless acts upstream of Six and Eya, the regulatory relationships between these genes are reversed in early vertebrate placode development.

Sequence-specific DNA binding is a major activity of the tumor suppressor p53 and a prerequisite for the transactivating potential of the protein. p53 interaction with target DNA is tightly regulated by various mechanisms, including binding of different components of the transcription machinery, post-translational modifications, and interactions with other factors that modulate p53 transactivation in a cell context-and promoter-specific manner. The bifunctional redox factor 1 (Ref-1/APE1) has been identified as one of the factors, which can stimulate p53 DNA binding by redox-dependent as well as redoxindependent mechanisms. Whereas stimulation of p53 DNA binding by the redox activities of Ref-1 is understood quite well, little is known about mechanisms that underlie the redox-independent effects of Ref-1. We report in this study a previously unknown activity of Ref-1 as a factor promoting tetramerization of p53. We demonstrate that Ref-1 promotes association of dimers into tetramers, and de-stacking of higher oligomeric forms into the tetrameric form in vitro, thereby enhancing p53 binding to target DNA.