The chicken is a well-established model for amniote (including human) skeletal muscle formation because the developmental anatomy of chicken skeletal muscle matches that of mammals. The accessibility of the chicken in the egg as well as the sequencing of its genome and novel molecular techniques have raised the profile of this model. Over the years, a number of regulatory and marker genes have been identified that are suited to monitor the progress of skeletal myogenesis both in wildtype and in experimental embryos. However, in the various studies, differing markers at different stages of development have been used. Moreover, contradictory results on the hierarchy of regulatory factors are now emerging, and clearly, factors need to be able to cooperate. Thus, a reference paper describing in detail and side-by-side the time course of marker gene expression during avian myogenesis is needed. We comparatively analysed onset and expression patterns of the key markers for the chicken immature paraxial mesoderm, for muscle-competent cells, for cells committed to myogenesis and for cells entering terminal differentiation. We performed this analysis from stages when the first paraxial mesoderm is being laid down to the stage when mesoderm formation comes to a conclusion. Our data show that, although the sequence of marker gene expression is the same at the various stages of development, the timing of the expression onset is quite different. Moreover, marker gene expression in myogenic cells being deployed from the dorsomedial and ventrolateral lips of the dermomyotome is different from those being deployed from the rostrocaudal lips, suggesting different molecular programs. Furthermore, expression of Myosin Heavy Chain genes is overlapping but different along the length of a myotube. Finally, Mef2c is the most likely partner of Mrf proteins, and, in contrast to the mouse and more alike frog and zebrafish fish, chicken Mrf4 is co-expressed with MyoG as cells enter terminal differentiation.

Dipeptidyl peptidases 8 and 9 (DPP8/9) have gathered interest as drug targets due to their important roles in biological processes like immunity and tumorigenesis. Elucidation of their distinct individual functions remains an ongoing task and could benefit from the availability of novel, chemically diverse and selective chemical tools. Here, we report the activity‐based protein profiling (ABPP)‐mediated discovery of 4‐oxo‐β‐lactams as potent, non‐substrate‐like nanomolar DPP8/9 inhibitors. X‐ray crystallographic structures revealed different ligand binding modes for DPP8 and DPP9, including an unprecedented targeting of an extended S2′ (eS2′) subsite in DPP8. Biological assays confirmed inhibition at both target and cellular levels. Altogether, our integrated chemical proteomics and structure‐guided small molecule design approach led to novel DPP8/9 inhibitors with alternative molecular inhibition mechanisms, delivering the highest selectivity index reported to date.

No abstract

Inflammasomes are intracellular protein complexes that promote an inflammatory host defense in response to pathogens and damaged or neoplastic tissues and are implicated in inflammatory disorders and therapeutic-induced toxicity. We investigated the mechanisms of activation for inflammasomes nucleated by NOD-like receptor (NLR) protiens. A screen of a small-molecule library revealed that several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)—including those that are clinically approved (such as imatinib and crizotinib) or are in clinical trials (such as masitinib)—activated the NLRP3 inflammasome. Furthermore, imatinib and masitinib caused lysosomal swelling and damage independently of their kinase target, leading to cathepsin-mediated destabilization of myeloid cell membranes and, ultimately, cell lysis that was accompanied by potassium (K + ) efflux, which activated NLRP3. This effect was specific to primary myeloid cells (such as peripheral blood mononuclear cells and mouse bone marrow–derived dendritic cells) and did not occur in other primary cell types or various cell lines. TKI-induced lytic cell death and NLRP3 activation, but not lysosomal damage, were prevented by stabilizing cell membranes. Our findings reveal a potential immunological off-target of some TKIs that may contribute to their clinical efficacy or to their adverse effects.

Inflammasomes are intracellular protein complexes that control proteolytic maturation and secretion of inflammatory interleukin-1 (IL-1) family cytokines and are thus important in host defense. While some inflammasomes are activated simply by binding to pathogen-derived molecules, others, including those nucleated by NLRP3 and NLRP1, have more complex activation mechanisms that are not fully understood. We screened a library of small molecules to identify new inflammasome activators that might shed light on activation mechanisms. In addition to validating dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP) inhibitors as NLRP1 activators, we find that clinical tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) including imatinib and masitinib activate the NLRP3 inflammasome. Mechanistically, these TKIs cause lysosomal swelling and damage, leading to cathepsin-mediated destabilization of myeloid cell membranes and cell lysis. This is accompanied by potassium (K+) efflux, which activates NLRP3. Both lytic cell death and NLRP3 activation but not lysosomal damage induced by TKIs are prevented by the cytoprotectant high molecular weight polyethylene glycol (PEG). Our study establishes a screening method that can be expanded for inflammasome research and immunostimulatory drug development, and provides new insight into immunological off-targets that may contribute to efficacy or adverse effects of TKIs.