Huntington's disease (HD) is an autosomal dominant disorder caused by a trinucleotide expansion in the huntingtin gene. Recently, a new role for tau has been implicated in the pathogenesis of HD, whereas others have argued that postmortem tau pathology findings are attributable to concurrent Alzheimer's disease pathology. The frequency of other well-defined common age-related tau pathologies in HD has not been examined in detail. In this single center, retrospective analysis, we screened seven cases of Huntington's disease (5 females, 2 males, age at death: 47-73 years) for neuronal and glial tau pathology using phospho-tau immunohistochemistry. All seven cases showed presence of neuronal tau pathology. Five cases met diagnostic criteria for primary age-related tauopathy (PART), with three cases classified as definite PART and two cases as possible PART, all with a Braak stage of I. One case was diagnosed with low level of Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change. In the youngest case, rare perivascular aggregates of tau-positive neurons, astrocytes and processes were identified at sulcal depths, meeting current neuropathological criteria for stage 1 chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE). Although the patient had no history of playing contact sports, he experienced several falls, but no definitive concussions during his disease course. Three of the PART cases and the CTE-like case showed additional evidence of agingrelated tau astrogliopathy. None of the cases showed significant tau pathology in the striatum. In conclusion, while we found evidence for tau hyperphosphorylation and aggregation in all seven of our HD cases, the tau pathology was readily classifiable into known diagnostic entities and most likely represents non-specific age-or perhaps trauma-related changes. As the tau pathology was very mild in all cases and not unexpected for a population of this age range, it does not appear that the underlying HD may have promoted or accelerated tau accumulation.
BACKGROUND
The international system for reporting serous fluid cytopathology (TIS) recommends submitting at least 50‐75 mL of serous fluid to decrease false‐negative results. However, prior studies did not agree on specific volume requirements or consensus adequacy criteria. Our study aims to assess whether fluid volume affects the adequacy rate and to assess the minimum volume necessary for optimal adequacy in pleural and peritoneal fluids.
METHODS
A total of 8530 serous fluid cytology cases were identified in the laboratory information system. Differences in mean fluid volume received in the laboratory were compared using an ANOVA Games‐Howell test based on TIS category. The percentage of malignant diagnoses across the volume ranges of 0 to 5 mL, 5 to 10 mL, 10 to 25 mL, 25 to 50 mL, 50 to 75 mL, 75 to 100 mL, 100 to 150 mL, 150 to 250 mL, 250 to 500 mL, 500 to 2000 mL was compared in pleural and peritoneal fluids using a chi‐square test, and a SiZer analysis was performed.
RESULTS
Mean fluid volume in inadequate, atypical, and negative cases was significantly lower compared to positive cases. A SiZer analysis showed a positive relationship between the malignancy fraction of pleural and peritoneal fluids and fluid volume. The percentage of malignant diagnoses in pleural and peritoneal fluid samples increased significantly up to a volume range of 75‐100 mL.
CONCLUSIONS
There is a significant relationship between fluid volume, adequacy and detection of malignancy in serous effusion cytopathology. The malignancy fraction increases with larger fluid volumes but at least 75‐100 mL of fluid should be submitted for optimal diagnosis of malignancy in pleural and peritoneal fluids.;
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.