Background: Reports suggest a potential association between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines and acute central nervous system (CNS) inflammation. Objective: The main objective of this study is to describe features of acute CNS inflammation following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was performed at the BARLO MS Centre in Toronto, Canada. Clinicians reported acute CNS inflammatory events within 60 days after a COVID-19 vaccine from March 2021 to August 2022. Clinical characteristics were evaluated. Results: Thirty-eight patients (median age 39 (range: 20–82) years; 60.5% female) presented within 0–55 (median 15) days of a receiving a COVID-19 vaccine and were diagnosed with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) ( n = 16), post-vaccine transverse myelitis ( n = 7), clinically isolated syndrome ( n = 5), MS relapse ( n = 4), tumefactive demyelination ( n = 2), myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease ( n = 1), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder ( n = 1), chronic lymphocytic inflammation with pontine perivascular enhancement responsive to steroids ( n = 1) and primary autoimmune cerebellar ataxia ( n = 1). Twenty-two received acute treatment and 21 started disease-modifying therapy. Sixteen received subsequent COVID-19 vaccination, of which 87.5% had no new or worsening neurological symptoms. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the largest study describing acute CNS inflammation after COVID-19 vaccination. We could not determine whether the number of inflammatory events was higher than expected.

BackgroundFor patients with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis (NMDARE) and ovarian teratoma, “conservative” surgical approaches (complete or partial unilateral oophorectomy or bilateral partial oophorectomies) are associated with clinical improvement. “Aggressive” ovarian resections (complete bilateral oophorectomy or “blind” ovarian resections without pre-operative evidence of teratoma) are also reported, although the evidence supporting these approaches is unclear.ObjectiveTo compare the one-year functional outcomes of patients with NMDARE who underwent conservative vs. aggressive ovarian resections.MethodsPatients with NMDARE undergoing ovarian resection between January 1st, 2012 and December 31st, 2021 were retrospectively identified from three North American tertiary care centers. Primary outcome was a modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2 one year after ovarian resection. Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare demographic features, disease characteristics, and functional outcomes between the two surgical groups. A fixed-effects meta-analysis of studies reporting functional outcomes based on surgical approach was also performed.ResultsTwenty-three patients were included. Eight underwent aggressive surgical management. There was a non-significant trend toward an association between aggressive surgical management and younger age-at-onset, higher baseline disease severity, and longer delays to treatment. There was no difference between “aggressive” (3/8, 38%) and “conservative” (11/15, 73%) management groups in achieving the primary outcome (OR95% = <0.1–1.9; p = 0.18). Findings were similar when considering data from 52 patients in two published studies (RR = 0.74; CI95% = 0.48–1.13; p = 0.16).ConclusionsAggressive ovarian resection was not associated with improved outcomes in patients with NMDARE in this series. Group differences may have contributed, recognizing that patients who underwent aggressive resection tended to be sicker, with procedures performed later in the disease course. Based on available evidence, we advocate for function-sparing resection in patients with imaging-confirmed/suspected teratoma, and repeated multi-modal imaging in at-risk patients with NMDARE refractory to conventional treatment.

No abstract