Remittance is one of the major sources of financial inclusion in Bangladesh. The contribution of remittance to the economy gradually increases with respect to time. The current study investigates the nexus between remittance and inflation by considering data from 1975 to 2019. The results of the Augmented Dickey Fuller (ADF) unit root indicate the variables are stationary at mixed order like as I(0) and I(1). Through the ADF test, this study conducts a dynamic autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model with considering the linear trend. The remittance has a significant and positive impact to raise inflation in the short run but is insignificant in the long run. The estimation found the speed of adjustment, Error correction term (ECT) is 69% and bound testing criteria indicate the long-run association among the variable. This investigation also concludes that the exchange rate has a positive impact on inflation where the real exchange rate has no positive impact to raise inflation in Bangladesh. The empirical findings suggest the productive and safe investment rathe expense in consumption purpose due to reducing the consequence of remittance inflows on inflation in Bangladesh.
This study investigates the factors that determined the bilateral trade deficit of Bangladesh against India. The results of the Johansen cointegration test indicated that there were long-term associations between the trade deficit of Bangladesh real income levels, and the bilateral RER of both countries. Results from the two-stage least squares regression analyses indicated that a 1% increase in the real income levels of Bangladesh and India aggravated the bilateral trade deficit of Bangladesh by 4.61% and 3.98% respectively while a 1% real appreciation of the bilateral real exchange rate was found to reduce the deficit by almost 6%, ceteris paribus. Results also showed that Bangladesh faced persistent deficits in its bilateral trade balance against India due to its exports being comparatively less elastic than its imports engagements with India. The paper also sheds light on the anti-dumping policy pursued by India that has contributed to the unbalanced trade between the two economies. Contribution/Originality: This study contributes to existing literature by analyzing the elasticities of Bangladesh's imports from and exports to India. It is relevant from the perspective of policy implications to understand the degrees of responsiveness of Bangladesh's import demand and export supply leading to the nation's trade deficit with India. 1. INTRODUCTION Welfare gains from the opening up of closed economies to engagements in bilateral and multilateral trading activities is believed to spawn economic welfare within the trading economies which, if executed under the appropriate trade regulations, can result in the nations' consuming beyond their respective production possibility frontier (Heckscher and Ohlin, 1991; Baldwin, 1992; Suga and Tawada, 2007). However, although the benefits from trading activities are conceptualized to ensure welfare gains for all the participatory nations in general, sometimes inefficient trading arrangements result in vast inequalities with respect to the unequal distributions of the gains from trade (Lincoln, 2001; Fajgelbaum and Khandelwal, 2016). As a result, more often than not, international trade under such circumstances results in welfare losses particularly for the relatively smaller trading partners as opposed to the comparatively larger counterparts (Markusen, 1981; Hamilton, 1985; Redding, 1999). International trade under suboptimal trading frameworks often leads to the exploitation of one trading partner by the other which ultimately contributes to the large trade deficit for the economy that is at the receiving end of such unfair treatments (Feenstra, 1995; Irwin, 2010). The imposition of undue trade restrictions, that favor a
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.