We describe a novel method for tracking the time course of visual identification processes, here applied to the specific case of letter perception. We combine a new behavioral measure of letter identification times with single-letter ERP recordings. Letter identification processes are considered to take place in those time windows in which the behavioral measure and ERPs are correlated. A first significant correlation was found at occipital electrode sites around 100 msec poststimulus onset that most likely reflects the contribution of low-level feature processing to letter identification. It was followed by a significant correlation at fronto-central sites around 170 msec, which we take to reflect letter-specific identification processes, including retrieval of a phonological code corresponding to the letter name. Finally, significant correlations were obtained around 220 msec at occipital electrode sites that may well be due to the kind of recurrent processing that has been revealed recently by TMS studies. Overall, these results suggest that visual identification processes are likely to be composed of a first (and probably preconscious) burst of visual information processing followed by a second reentrant processing on visual areas that could be critical for the conscious identification of the visual target.
Learning to read involves setting up associations between meaningless visual inputs (V) and their phonological representations (P). Here, we recorded the brain signals (ERPs and fMRI) associated with phonological recoding (i.e., V-P conversion processes) in an artificial learning situation in which participants had to learn the associations between 24 unknown visual symbols (Japanese Katakana characters) and 24 arbitrary monosyllabic names. During the learning phase on Day 1, the strength of V-P associations was manipulated by varying the proportion of correct and erroneous associations displayed during a two-alternative forced choice task. Recording event related potentials (ERPs) during the learning phase allowed us to track changes in the processing of these visual symbols as a function of the strength of V-P associations. We found that, at the end of the learning phase, ERPs were linearly affected by the strength of V-P associations in a time-window starting around 200ms post-stimulus onset on right occipital sites and ending around 345ms on left occipital sites. On Day 2, participants had to perform a matching task during an fMRI session and the strength of these V-P associations was again used as a probe for identifying brain regions related to phonological recoding. Crucially, we found that the left fusiform gyrus was gradually affected by the strength of V-P associations suggesting that this region is involved in the brain network supporting phonological recoding processes.
Single-word naming is one of the most widely used experimental paradigms for studying how we read words. Following the seminal study by Spieler and Balota (Psychological Science 8:411-416, 1997), accounting for variance in item-level naming databases has become a major challenge for computational models of word reading. Using a new large-scale database of naming responses, we first provided a precise estimate of the amount of reproducible variance that models should try to account for with such databases. Second, by using an item-level measure of delayed naming, we showed that it captures not only the variance usually explained by onset phonetic properties, but also an additional part of the variance related to output processes. Finally, by comparing the item means from this new database with the ones reported in a previous study, we found that the two sets of item response times were highly reliable (r 0 .94) when the variance related to onset phonetic properties and voice-key sensitivity was factored out. Overall, the present results provide new guidelines for testing computational models of word naming with item-level databases.Keywords Single-word naming . Item-level performance . Large-scale databases . Accounting for variance . Testing computational modelsThe precision of theories and the grain size of empirical evidence do not always follow the same developmental trajectories in science, and this statement is certainly also valid for psycholinguistic research. Indeed, three decades ago, with the development of the first computerimplemented models (e.g., McClelland & Rumelhart, 1981), the precision of theoretical predictions has grown dramatically with the possibility for these artificial, dynamic systems to generate item-level predictions. At the same time, the grain size of empirical evidence was still bounded by a set of benchmark effects (e.g., the word frequency effect and consistency or regularity effects) modulated, in the best cases, by interaction effects (e.g., the Regularity × Frequency interaction; Taraban & McClelland, 1987).To compensate for the disequilibrium between the grain size of the empirical data and the grain size of theoretical predictions, Spieler and Balota (1997) collected a largescale database (31 participants, reading aloud a set of 2,870 monosyllabic English words) and tested the descriptive adequacy of various computational models of word reading against these item-level measures of performance, initiating what we may call a "nanopsycholinguistic" approach. The outcome was quite disappointing for modelers, since the best model only accounted for around 10 % of the item variance. More surprisingly, a linear combination of three simple factors (Log Frequency, Neighborhood Density, and Word Length) accounted for 27.1 % of the variance, and when the onset phoneme characteristics were taken into account, this percentage even reached 43.1 %, which was much higher than the predictions of any of the models tested in that study. Instead of re-equilibrating the precision rati...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.