Measures directed at reducing the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis may reduce morbidity in neonates with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and reduce cost by decreasing hospital length of stay. A standardized feeding protocol instituted to address these problems likely contributed to reducing the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in this high-risk population.
Postprandial retrograde diastolic flow was observed in the majority of patients palliated with an mBTS vs. none of the patients in the Sano group. However, contrary to expectations, postprandial mesenteric blood flow velocities in those palliated with an mBTS are significantly higher than in Sano patients, although the increase is not as high as that historically seen in normal neonates. This may place this population at risk for mesenteric ischemia and feeding intolerance in the postoperative period, and the risk may be even greater for those neonates palliated with a right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery conduit.
A potential advantage of the right ventricle to pulmonary artery versus modified Blalock–Taussig shunt in patients undergoing the Norwood procedure is limitation of diastolic runoff from the systemic to pulmonary circulation. We evaluated mesenteric flow patterns and gastrointestinal outcomes following the Norwood procedure associated with either shunt type. Patients randomized to a right ventricle to pulmonary artery versus modified Blalock–Taussig shunt in the Pediatric Heart Network Single Ventricle Reconstruction Trial at centers participating in this ancillary study were eligible for inclusion; those with active necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, or end-organ dysfunction were excluded. Celiac artery flow characteristics and gastrointestinal outcomes were collected at discharge. Forty-four patients (five centers) were included. Median age at surgery was 5 days [interquartile range (IQR) = 4–8 days]. Median celiac artery resistive index (an indicator of resistance to perfusion) was higher in the modified Blalock–Taussig shunt group (n = 19) versus the right ventricle to pulmonary artery shunt group (n = 25) [1.00 (IQR = 0.84–1.14) vs. 0.82 (IQR = 0.74–1.00), p = 0.02]. There was no difference in interstage weight gain, necrotizing enterocolitis, or feeding intolerance episodes between the groups. The celiac artery resistive index was higher in patients with the modified Blalock–Taussig shunt versus the right ventricle to pulmonary artery shunt but was not associated with measured gastrointestinal outcomes.
Simplified GTV (sGTV) was calculated by oval volume formula. We confirmed statistically significant association between sGTV and standard GTV as previous preparation. Metastatic nodal extent was divided into limited nodal extent (ND2a) (defined as "LN") or extensive nodal extent (>ND2a)(defined as "EN"). Prognostic impact of sGTV and metastatic nodal extent was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis. Result: 58 patients were enrolled in this study. Median progression-free survival (PFS) of all patients were 9.0 months. In univariate analysis, patients with sGTV>90cm 3 had shorter PFS compared to those with sGTV90cm 3 (median PFS: 6.7 vs. 11.7, p¼0.03). Further, patients with sGTV>90cm 3 and EN showed poorer PFS (HR 3.3; 95% CI,1.40-7.87; p<0.01) and OS (HR 3.3, 95% CI: 1.18-9.32, p<0.01) in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis also showed an independent poor prognosis in patients with sGTV>90cm 3 and EN (adjusted HR of PFS: 3.6, 95% CI: 1.49-8.71, p<0.01, adjusted HR of OS 4.1, 95% CI: 1.37-12.6, p¼0.01). Conclusion: Combined evaluation using sGTV and metastatic nodal extent can be a useful stratified factor for clinical trial in patients with stage III NSCLC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.