The domains that physiotherapists need to measure during clinical assessment were identified. In the second stage of the project these domains will inform systematic reviews to identify the most robust outcome measures for use in clinical practice.

Background: the central tenet of the neurofacilitatory approach to stroke therapy is that muscle tone needs to be normal before normal movement can occur. A reliable clinical measure of the full spectrum of muscle tone is needed to test: (i) the purported relationship between muscle tone, other motor impairments and disability, and (ii) the effectiveness of stroke therapy to restore movement. Aim: the purpose of the study was to test the inter-rater reliability of clinical categorization of muscle tone (spastic/normal/flaccid) and also a visual analogue scale with anchor points of 'lowest tone possible' (score 0) and 'highest tone possible' (score 100). Methods: four independent raters assessed tone of elbow flexors and knee extensors of 14 stroke rehabilitation inpatients using the categorical scale. Six independent raters assessed tone of elbow flexors and knee extensors of 25 chronic stroke patients and two healthy volunteers using the visual analogue scale. All assessment orders were randomized. Results: both scales were unreliable, with k coefficients for the categorical scale ranging from -0.046 to 0.56 for the categorical scale, and intra-class correlation coefficients for the visual analogue scale of 0.595 for elbow flexors and 0.451 for knee extensors. Assessment order effects for the visual analogue scale were non-significant for elbow flexors (P ¼ 0.545) and knee extensors (P ¼ 0.911). Conclusions: these results, and those of earlier studies, suggest that clinical measures of muscle tone are consistently unreliable. Systematic investigation of the therapy rationale for planning and evaluating treatment is required before relevant clinical measures can be developed.

Introduction. This small pilot study aimed to examine the feasibility of an upper limb rehabilitation system (the YouGrabber) in a community rehabilitation centre, qualitatively explore participant experiences, and describe changes after using it. Methods and Material. Chronic stroke participants attending a community rehabilitation centre in the UK were randomised to either a YouGrabber or a gym group and completed 18 training sessions over 12 weeks. The motor activity log, box and block, and fatigue severity score were administered by a blinded assessor before and after the intervention. Semistructured interviews were used to ascertain participants' views about using the YouGrabber. Results. Twelve participants (6 females) with chronic stroke were recruited. All adhered to the intervention. There were no adverse events, dropouts, or withdrawal. There were no significant differences between the YouGrabber and gym groups although there were significant within group improvements on the motor activity log (median change: 0.59, range: 0.2–1.25; p < 0.05) within the YouGrabber group. Participants reported that the YouGrabber was motivational but they expressed frustration with technical challenges. Conclusions. The YouGrabber appeared practical and may improve upper limb activities in people several months after stroke. Future work could examine cognition, cost effectiveness, and different training intensities.