Purpose Schizophrenia is a chronic and serious mental disorder characterized by disturbances in thought, perception, and behavior that impair daily functioning and quality of life. Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic medications may improve long-term outcomes over oral medications; however, LAI antipsychotic medications are often only considered as a last resort late in the disease course. This study sought to assess current clinical practice patterns, clinicians’ attitudes, and barriers to the use of LAI antipsychotic medications as well as identify unmet educational needs of psychiatric clinicians in managing patients with schizophrenia. Methods A survey was distributed via email to 2330 United States-based clinicians who manage patients with schizophrenia; 379 completed the survey and were included for analysis. The survey included five patient case-based scenarios, with seven decision points. Data were analyzed with qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Results Clinicians were most confident in determining when to initiate treatment and least confident in transitioning to injectable therapy or administering injectable therapy. Clinicians cited nonadherence, and not wanting to take daily medicine or the “hassle” of frequent treatment, as key factors for which patients were most suitable for an LAI antipsychotic medication. Patient nonadherence was considered the most important barrier to optimal management of patients with schizophrenia. A clinician’s perception of relapse was a strong driver of whether or not the clinician would discuss/recommend an LAI antipsychotic medication. Conclusion This study suggests that clinicians may be reluctant to discuss or recommend switching patients to an LAI antipsychotic medication if they are perceived as doing well on current therapy. These results will inform future research and continuing education that aims to improve the confidence, knowledge, and competence of clinicians who provide care for patients with schizophrenia who may benefit from treatment with an LAI antipsychotic medication and clinicians who may be more likely to routinely offer an LAI antipsychotic medication to their patients.

Patients with beta thalassemia are benefitting from longer life expectancies, highlighting the importance of appropriate transition from pediatric to adult care. Data are limited regarding continuity of care and adult hematologists' management of patients with beta thalassemia. We conducted a survey of practicing US hematologists to identify practice gaps, attitudes, and barriers to optimal patient management among US-practicing hematologists. A total of 42 responses were collected, with 19 (45%) practicing at a beta thalassemia center of excellence (CoE). Nearly 90% of CoE physicians said they had a transition protocol or plan in place versus 30% of non-CoE physicians. Most physicians said parents should remain actively involved in medical visits. Adherence was rated as the most important patient education topic during transition. The most significant barrier cited was patient reluctance to transition away from pediatric care. Physicians in CoEs as compared with non-CoE physicians reported greater knowledge of beta thalassemia and familiarity with butyrates, gene therapy, and luspatercept. Highly rated topics for beta thalassemia-focused CME activities included management of complications and clinical trial updates. These findings suggest practice gaps and barriers to optimal care in the transition from pediatric to adult care, the ongoing management of adult patients, knowledge of the disease state, and familiarity with emerging treatments. Differences CoE vs non-CoE physician responses suggest variations in knowledge, practice, and attitudes that may be helpful in tailoring CME activities to different learner audiences. The small sample size used in some sub-analyses may not be representative of all hematologists treating beta thalassemia patients.

Background: Management of short-bowel syndrome with intestinal failure (SBS-IF) is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Because of the rarity of SBS-IF, healthcare professionals (HCPs) often lack clinical experience with the disease and may benefit from education regarding SBS-IF and its management. This study identified unmet educational needs related to the management of patients with SBS-IF.Methods: This was a prospective, web-based survey (December 2019-January 2020) in which a series of clinical questions were posed to US HCPs after presenting three standardized SBS-IF cases to assess current practice patterns. HCPs were then asked a series of questions to identify potential knowledge gaps and unmet educational needs relating to SBS-IF management.Results: Overall, 558 HCPs completed the survey, with 12%-38% having a formal SBS-IF multidisciplinary team currently available to make treatment decisions within their institution. Clinicians involved in care included gastroenterologists (93%), registered dietitians (79%), gastroenterology nurse practitioners and physician assistants (37%), registered nurses (43%), social workers (45%), and psychologists/ psychiatrists (27%). There was underuse of published guidelines and limited understanding of the course of intestinal adaptation. Responses to the clinical scenarios highlighted disparities in SBS-IF care delivery, including diagnosis, management goals, medications prescribed, and nutrition practices. Conclusions: Future SBS-IF educational interventions for HCPs should aim to improve awareness and understanding of the disease, facilitate timely diagnosis, and standardize management practices to ensure patients receive optimal interdisciplinary care as widely as possible.

Purpose Schizophrenia is a chronic, serious, and disabling mental disorder that affects how an individual thinks, feels, and behaves. With the availability of effective antipsychotic medications, the care of people with schizophrenia has shifted from psychiatric hospitals to outpatient treatment and caregivers, including family members. Caregivers are an often-overlooked target for education but may be a key resource to enhance patient education and foster greater adherence to treatment. This study sought to examine the burdens faced by caregivers and determine their specific educational needs. Methods A survey instrument was developed and fielded to 96 caregivers of patients with schizophrenia in the United States (September–October 2019) via online communities and caregiver newsletters. Survey responses were organized into specific topics: symptoms exhibited when diagnosed, current treatment options and use of long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic medications, treatment adherence attitudes, barriers for caregivers and patients, informational resources utilized, and caregiver information and educational topics. Results Caregivers identified hallucinations, delusions, disorganized behavior, thought disorder, and aggression as the most worrisome symptoms of schizophrenia. Most caregivers felt that they act as a mediator between the medical team and the patient and that they are responsible for the patient’s adherence to treatment. Caregivers report that a schizophrenia diagnosis has strained their own emotional health, reduced their ability to have a satisfying personal life, and disrupted their family life. Caregivers generally had fewer barriers caring for patients receiving LAI antipsychotic treatments than caring for patients not receiving such treatments. Caregivers were interested in learning more about new treatments, coping strategies, and understanding specific symptoms. Conclusion Caregivers need help recognizing, understanding, and managing specific and common symptoms of schizophrenia. Information about strategies to handle these symptoms would be beneficial. Caregivers also want information on new and emerging therapies, which may help facilitate discussions with clinicians about different treatment options.

Purpose Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are a part of a complex metabolic disease process requiring a multi-faceted and multidisciplinary management approach. This study was conducted to identify areas where medical education across a multidisciplinary team could be optimized in providing optimal care of patients with NAFLD/NASH. Methods A survey instrument including a patient case vignette was developed to understand approaches of US clinicians to diagnosis and management of patients with NAFLD/NASH. The survey was fielded via email in December 2020–January 2021. Analysis was conducted using embedded Qualtrics analytic software. Results There were 629 survey respondents: 318 PCPs, including physicians, NPs, and PAs, 57 hepatologists, 156 gastroenterologists, and 98 endocrinologists. Survey results demonstrated variation in likelihood to screen patients for NAFLD/NASH among specialists and PCPs as well as in the types of clinicians that respondents would involve in the initial management of a patient diagnosed with NASH. Notably, between 15% and 33% across respondent clinician types would not include any other clinicians or medical specialists in initial management. For a patient with newly diagnosed NASH, the most likely initial management recommendations included drug therapy to improve control of diabetes and therapy to lower lipids and were less likely to recommend drug therapy for weight loss, drug therapy for NASH, or bariatric surgery. Respondents rated “poor patient adherence to lifestyle modifications” and “lack of approved therapies for NASH” as the most significant barriers to optimal management of patients with NASH. Conclusion Variation in the evaluation and management of patients with NAFLD/NASH across PCPs and medical subspecialists was identified in this study. Education aimed at multidisciplinary roles in optimally managing patients with NAFLD/NASH, can be beneficial, particularly if focused on increasing screening, implementing guideline updates as they emerge, and incorporating new therapies as they gain approval for clinical practice.