The third variable region (V3) of the HIV-1 gpl20 envelope glycoprotein is thought to induce potent
A human immunoglobulin Gi lambda monoclonal antibody (MAb), 697-D, was developed that recognizes the V2 region of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) gpl20. Substitutions at amino acid positions 176/177, 179/180, 183/184, and 192 to 194 in the V2 loop of gpl20 each completely abolished the binding capacity of 697-D in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay format. Competition analysis with three different neutralizing murine anti-V2 MAbs confirmed the specificity of 697-D. The 697-D epitope is primarily conformation dependent, although there was weak reactivity of the MAb with a V2 peptide spanning residues 161 to 180. Treatment of recombinant gpl20 HIVIIIB with sodium metaperiodate, which oxidizes carbohydrates, abolished the binding of the MAb, showing the dependence of the epitope on intact carbohydrates. The broad reactivity of 697-D was displayed by its binding to the gpl20 molecules from four of four laboratory isolates and five of five primary isolates. The MAb 697-D neutralized three out of four primary isolates but failed to neutralize any of four laboratory strains of HIV-1. 697-D and a human anti-V3 MAb, 447-52-D, displayed similar potency in neutralizing primary isolates, indicating that the V2 region of gpl20, like the V3 region and the CD4-binding domain, can induce potent neutralizing antibodies against HIV-1 in humans.
Immunogenic regions of the gp4l transmembrane protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) were previously mapped by examining polyclonal sera from HIV-infected patients and rodent polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to peptides of gp4l. To define the epitopes within these regions to which infected humans respond during the course of infection, the specificity of human MAbs to these regions had to be studied. Using 10 human MAbs identffied initially by their reactivity to whole gp4l in HIV-1 lysates, the epitopes within the immunodominant region of gp4l and within a second immunogenic region of gp4l have been mapped. Thus, five MAbs (from five different patients) to the immunodominant domain of gp4l in the vicinity of the cysteines at positions 598 and 604 (hereinafter designated cluster I) reacted with a stretch of 11 amino acids from positions 590 to 600. Four of these five MAbs were reactive with linear epitopes, while one MAb required the conformation conferred by the disulfide bridge between the aforementioned cysteines. Three MAbs to cluster I revealed dissociation constants ranging from 10-6 to 10-8 M, depending on the MAb tested and the size of the synthetic or recombinant peptide used in the assay. Five additional MAbs reacted with a second immunogenic region between positions 644 and 663 (designated cluster II). Four of these five MAbs were specific for conformational determinants. Titration of sera from HIV-infected patients showed that there was about 100-fold more antibody to cluster I than to cluster II in patients' sera, confirming the immunodominance of cluster I.
BackgroundHigh quality genetic material is an essential pre-requisite when analyzing gene expression using microarray technology. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) are frequently used for genomic analyses, but several factors can affect the integrity of nucleic acids prior to their extraction, including the methods of PBMC collection and isolation. Due to the lack of the relevant data published, we compared the Ficoll-Paque density gradient centrifugation and BD Vacutainer cell preparation tube (CPT) protocols to determine if either method offered a distinct advantage in preparation of PBMC-derived immune cell subsets for their use in gene expression analysis. We evaluated the yield and purity of immune cell subpopulations isolated from PBMC derived by both methods, the quantity and quality of extracted nucleic acids, and compared gene expression in PBMC and individual immune cell types from Ficoll and CPT isolation protocols using Affymetrix microarrays.ResultsThe mean yield and viability of fresh PBMC acquired by the CPT method (1.16 × 106 cells/ml, 93.3 %) were compatible to those obtained with Ficoll (1.34 × 106 cells/ml, 97.2 %). No differences in the mean purity, recovery, and viability of CD19+ (B cells), CD8+ (cytotoxic T cells), CD4+ (helper T cell) and CD14+ (monocytes) positively selected from CPT- or Ficoll-isolated PBMC were found. Similar quantities of high quality RNA and DNA were extracted from PBMC and immune cells obtained by both methods. Finally, the PBMC isolation methods tested did not impact subsequent recovery and purity of individual immune cell subsets and, importantly, their gene expression profiles.ConclusionsOur findings demonstrate that the CPT and Ficoll PBMC isolation protocols do not differ in their ability to purify high quality immune cell subpopulations. Since there was no difference in the gene expression profiles between immune cells obtained by these two methods, the Ficoll isolation can be substituted by the CPT protocol without conceding phenotypic changes of immune cells and compromising the gene expression studies. Given that the CPT protocol is less elaborate, minimizes cells’ handling and processing time, this method offers a significant operating advantage, especially in large-scale clinical studies aiming at dissecting gene expression in PBMC and PBMC-derived immune cell subpopulations.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12865-015-0113-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.