Background and Aims:
The aim of the study was to aid decisions on prognosis and transplantation; this study describes the outcome of children with intestinal failure managed by the multidisciplinary intestinal rehabilitation program at the Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne.
Methods:
Retrospective review of children requiring parenteral nutrition (PN) for >3 months who were assessed for home PN between 1991 and 2011.
Results:
A total of 51 children were included. Forty-two (82%) had short bowel syndrome (SBS), 5 (10%) had chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction syndrome, and 4 (8%) had congenital enteropathies. Median small bowel length for patients with SBS was 45 cm (interquartile range 30–80) or 23.9% of the expected length for age (interquartile range 17.0%–40.6%). Overall survival rate was 84% (43/51). Mortality in children (n = 7) occurred after a median of 13.2 months (range 6.2–29.2) with intestinal failure–associated liver disease (IFALD) being the only predictor (P = 0.001). Out of 50 children 21 (42%) had IFALD. Children who were premature (P = 0.013), had SBS (P = 0.038), and/or frequent sepsis (P = 0.014) were more likely to develop IFALD. PN weaning occurred in 27 of 35 (77%) SBS survivors, after a median of 10.8 months (up to 8.2 years), with longer residual small bowel (P = 0.025), preservation of the ileocecal valve (P = 0.013) and colon (P = 0.011) being predictors. None of 5 (0%) patients with chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction syndrome and 2 of 4 (50%) patients with congenital enteropathies weaned off PN. Overall sepsis rate was 7.3 episodes/1000 line days. Frequency of sepsis and longevity of central lines improved with time as patients grew older (both P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
Long-term PN with intestinal rehabilitation was effective in treating most children with intestinal failure. Children with severe refractory IFALD may have benefited from intestinal transplantation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.