The incidence of secondary primary malignancy (SPM) has been reported to range from 1.33% to 5.8%, according to the location of the primary cancer and the follow-up duration. The highest occurrence rate of SPM, of 36.6% within 6 months, has been reported in lung cancer. Genitourinary malignancies were reported to be the third-most-common SPM in several reports. However, the incidence of genitourinary malignancy as the first primary cancer associated with SPM has not been reported. Several risk factors are related to the occurrence of SPM, including viral infection chemotherapy, radiation, genetics, smoking, betel quid chewing, and environmental factors. An early survey for SPM is indicated in first primary malignancy patients with these associated factors. In this study, we summarize several risk factors related to the occurrence of SPMs and preventive tests, which may help in their early detection and, consequently, better survival.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the treatment of choice for staghorn stones. However, residual stones in calyces remain a challenge due to the limited angle which makes the approach difficult. The new operative technique of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS), which integrates the advantages of PCNL and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), was developed to overcome this difficulty. However, two experienced urologists are required to perform ECIRS, and the patient has to be placed in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position or modified prone split-leg position which cannot be achieved in the elderly or patients with ankylosing arthritis, as it may cause harm due to abnormal traction of the joints. In addition, it is difficult for surgeons to create an ideal access tract to perform PCNL in this position. We report the case of a 72-year-old female patient with left staghorn stone. We performed RIRS first and then placed the patient in the decubitus position for PCNL with antegrade flexible ureteroscopy. This method allows patients to be placed in an easier position, with the use of flexible ureteroscopy through a nephroscope to find previously unreachable stones. Moreover, in addition to the more comfortable position both for surgeons and patients, this procedure can also deal with large complex renal stones as with ECIRS. We also created a brand-new definition for stone clearance rate, namely, stone reduction efficiency (SRE). There was a high stone reduction efficiency of 12.64 (mm2/min) in our patient, and no complications occurred. We suggest that this procedure is an ideal alternative treatment for a huge staghorn stone instead of PCNL or ECIRS.

Prostate abscess (PA) can lead to severe urosepsis and septic shock if not treated promptly. However, early diagnosis can be hindered by the declining incidence of PA, especially in developing countries and high-risk patients. Despite the prevalence of PA, there is currently a lack of well-established contemporary guidelines or treatment algorithms. This study aimed to review the etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment options for PA, as well as analyze the characteristics, background profiles of patients, and clinical course. Ultimately, the goal was to develop a personalized treatment strategy for patients with PA. This retrospective study examined 44 patients diagnosed with PA at a tertiary medical center between 2010 and 2020. The patients were divided into two groups based on their treatment: conservative treatment or intervention (transurethral resection of the prostate [TURP] or transurethral prostate drainage [TPD]). The study evaluated various factors, including patients’ background profiles, comorbidities, laboratory data, and PA size and volume. Complications of the interventions were also analyzed. No significant differences were found in basic data between the conservative treatment group (19 patients) and intervention group (25 patients; 20 for TURP, 5 for TPD). However, it was observed that single abscesses, size <2.2 cm, and prostate volume <48 cm3, may be suitable for conservative treatment. Patients with diabetes mellitus and human immunodeficiency virus should be monitored for thrombotic events. In addition, there was a significant difference in white blood count between the two groups (12.1 ± 7.0 vs. 17.6 ± 9.7 × 109/L, p < 0.05). A subgroup analysis of the intervention group showed no significant difference in the risk of complications between TPD and TURP. Patients with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus and immunodeficiency are at a high risk of PA but are not indicated for surgical treatment. The PA profile, including number, size, volume, and percentage to prostate volume, should be considered when deciding on surgical intervention for patients with PA. Patients with higher leukocytosis may require surgical treatment. Overall, these findings can help guide the development of a personalized treatment strategy for patients with PA.