BackgroundNon-invasive ventilation (NIV) improves survival and quality of life in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients. The timing of referral to a home ventilation service (HVS), which is in part based on respiratory function tests, has shown room for improvement. It is currently unknown which respiratory function test predicts an appropriate timing of the initiation of NIV.MethodsWe analysed, retrospectively, serial data of five respiratory function tests: forced vital capacity (FVC), peak cough flow (PCF), maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressure (MIP and MEP) and sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) in patients with ALS. Patients who had had at least one assessment of respiratory function and one visit at the HVS, were included. Our aim was to detect the test with the highest predictive value for the need for elective NIV in the following 3 months. We analysed time curves, currently used cut-off values for referral, and respiratory function test results between ‘NIV indication’ and ‘no-NIV indication’ patients.ResultsOne hundred ten patients with ALS were included of whom 87 received an NIV indication; 11.5% had one assessment before receiving an NIV indication, 88.5% had two or more assessments. The NIV indication was based on complaints of hypoventilation and/or proven (nocturnal) hypercapnia. The five respiratory function tests showed a descending trend during disease progression, where SNIP showed the greatest decline within the latest 3 months before NIV indication (mean = −22%). PCF at the time of referral to the HVS significantly discriminated between the groups ‘NIV-indication’ and ‘no NIV-indication yet’ patients at the first HVS visit: 259 (±92) vs. 348 (±137) L/min, p = 0.019. PCF and SNIP showed the best predictive characteristics in terms of sensitivity.ConclusionSNIP showed the greatest decline prior to NIV indication and PCF significantly differentiated ‘NIV-indication’ from ‘no NIV-indication yet’ patients with ALS. Currently used cut-off values might be adjusted and other respiratory function tests such as SNIP and PCF may become part of routine care in patients with ALS in order to avoid non-timely initiation of (non-invasive) ventilation.

Background and objective: Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is an established treatment for respiratory failure in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Several studies have shown room for improvement with regard to respiratory care for ALS patients, including latency of referral. These studies focused on the time period starting at the moment of referral to a home ventilation service (HVS) onwards. In the current study we performed a nationwide survey to gain insight in the trajectory before referral. We questioned the assessment of respiratory impairment by ALS physicians/care teams, including criteria for referral to an HVS. Methods: We requested 40 ALS care teams in the Netherlands to fill in an online questionnaire on respiratory management in ALS patients. Results: Thirty-two ALS care teams (80%) responded. Forced vital capacity was the most frequently used test at each outpatient visit (72%) and often served as a criterion (78%) for referral to an HVS. Other respiratory function measurements that were performed less often included peak cough flow (50%), maximum inspiratory/expiratory pressure (31%/28%) and sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (13%). Morning headache was the most frequently questioned complaint (94%), followed by daytime sleepiness (91%). Dyspnoea and orthopnoea were reported by 38% and 59% as important complaints. Out of all patients under the care of the ALS care teams, the mean estimated proportion of patients that was referred to an HVS was 69% (range 20-100%). When physicians refrained from referral, the most often cited reasons were patient's decision to withhold NIV (94%) and cognitive impairment (50%). Sixteen percent of the respondents stated bulbar impairment as a reason to refrain from referral. Conclusion: Despite findings in previous studies on the superiority of SNIP and PCF as compared to FVC, our study shows that a majority of ALS care teams still prefers to use FVC for the assessment of respiratory dysfunction and for the timing of referral to an HVS. Another finding is that bulbar impairment is not an obstacle for referral for NIV.

Despite findings in previous studies on the superiority of SNIP and PCF as compared to FVC, our study shows that a majority of ALS care teams still prefers to use FVC for the assessment of respiratory dysfunction and for the timing of referral to an HVS. Another finding is that bulbar impairment is not an obstacle for referral for NIV.