Field trials were conducted in three agro-climatic zones of the country to evaluate the effect of cassava-legume-based intercropping systems on the population dynamics of legumes insect pests. The experiment consisted of a factorial treatment combination of seven cropping systems, two cassava architectures, and two spatial arrangements. The study reveals that a higher percentage incidence and severity scores of the legumes insect pests were recorded on the sole legumes compared to the intercropping systems. Also, intercropping the grain legumes using the erect cassava variety at a spatial arrangement of 1 m x 1 m recorded the lowest number of pests per plant, incidence and severity of legumes insect pests compared to the branched cassava architecture, and the 2 m x 0.5 m spatial arrangement. In conclusion, it was shown that, cassava-legume intercropping systems could significantly influence reduction in the number of pests per plant, incidence, and severity of legumes insect pests.
Competition among component crops in an intercropping system is an important factor that influences productivity. To realize the benefit of intercropping in terms of higher productivity per unit area, the competitive behaviour of component crops needs to be quantified. As such, an experiment was conducted to determine the competitive behaviour of component crops in cassava-legume-based intercropping systems. The experiment was a factorial randomized complete design with three replications. The treatments consisted of seven cropping associations and two spatial arrangements. The result shows that both land equivalent ratio and area time equivalent ratio was greater than one and was higher for the cassava-soybean system compared to the other cropping systems. In general, the land equivalent ratio was higher than the area time equivalent ratio across the three agro-climatic zones. In the case for the competitive ratio and the relative crowding coefficient, both indices were higher for cassava compared to the legumes and were also higher for the cassava-soybean system compared to the other cropping systems. Also, both indices were on average higher when the legumes were intercropped with cassava using the 2 m x 0.5 m spatial arrangement. The result further shows a higher monetary advantage index for all cropping systems compared to monocropping. In conclusion, it was shown that, cassava-legume-based intercropping systems were advantageous in terms of both competitive and economic indices.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.