Similar segments blocked with epidural anaesthesia have resulted in similar ID. During maintenance, identical amounts of bupivacaine applied from different levels have resulted in different MD of propofol. The concentration of the epidural anaesthesia appears to play a more important role than the applied amount of the local anaesthetic.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether any benefit of low frequency positive pressure ventilation with extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (LFPPV-ECCO2R) existed over either volume controlled ventilation (VCV) with measured best-PEEP or pressure regulated volume controlled ventilation (PRVCV) with an inspiration/expiration (I/E) ratio of 4:1, with respect to arterial oxygenation, lung mechanics and haemodynamics, in acute respiratory failure. Fifteen adult pigs were used for the study. Respiratory failure was induced by surfactant depletion by repeated lung lavage. The different therapeutic approaches were applied randomly to each pig for 1 h. Measurements of gas exchange, airway pressures and haemodynamics were performed during ventilatory and haemodynamic steady state. Paco2 was kept constant in all modes. At almost similar total-PEEP, Pao2 values were significantly higher with LFPPV-ECCO2R compared to VCV with best-PEEP. Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) and intrapulmonary pressure amplitude defined as the difference between PIP and total-PEEP were significantly lower with PRVCV and LFPPV-ECCO2R compared to VCV with best-PEEP. There was no significant difference between the modes concerning cardiocirculatory parameters. PRVCV with I/E ratio of 4:1 and LFPPV-ECCO2R proved to be better modes to achieve better gas exchange and lower PIP at lower intrapulmonary pressure amplitudes. It is concluded that PRVCV is an adequate form of treatment under these experimental conditions imitating acute respiratory failure, without necessitating other invasive measures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.