Blood pressure regulation failures cause neurally mediated syncope often resulting in a fall. A warning device might help to make patients aware of an impending critical event or even trigger the patient to perform countermeasures such as lying down or isometric exercises. We previously demonstrated that the Pulse Arrival Time (PAT) methodology is a potential approach to enable early detection of impending faints. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether PAT can be used as an easy to measure beat-to-beat surrogate for systolic blood pressure (SBP) changes during a passive standing exercise (head-up tilt table testing (HUTT)). A significant PAT increase of more than 10 % was accompanied with a critical SBP decrease in syncope patients. Although PAT is in general not considered as a good measure of absolute blood pressure we found strong correlations (R>0.89, P<0.01) of SBP and PAT after PAT began to increase. Therefore, our data suggest that the pulse arrival time is useful to monitor blood pressure changes in patients with neurally mediated syncope. This might open up new avenues to prevent falls in these patients.

BackgroundRecent evidence indicates that sympathetic/parasympathetic coactivation (CoA) is causally linked to changes in heart rate (HR) dynamics. Whether this is relevant for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown.Material/MethodsIn patients with paroxysmal AF (n=26) and age-matched controls, (n=10) we investigated basal autonomic outflow and HR dynamics during separate sympathetic (cold hand immersion) and parasympathetic activation (O2-inhalation), as well as during CoA (cold face test). In an additional cohort (n=7), HR response was assessed before and after catheter-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Ultra-high-density endocardial mapping was performed in patients (n=6) before and after CoA.ResultsSympathetic activation increased (control: 74±3 vs. 77±3 bpm, p=0.0098; AF: 60±2 vs. 64±2 bpm, p=0.0076) and parasympathetic activation decreased HR (control: 71±3 vs. 69±3 bpm, p=0.0547; AF: 60±1 vs. 58±2 bpm, p<0.0009), while CoA induced a paradoxical HR increase in patients with AF (control: 73±3 vs. 71±3 bpm, p=0.084; AF: 59±2 vs. 61±2 bpm, p=0.0006), which was abolished after PVI. Non-linear parameters of HR variability (SD1) were impaired during coactivation in patients with AF (control: 61±7 vs. 69±6 ms, p=0.042, AF: 44±32 vs. 32±5 ms, p=0.3929). CoA was associated with a shift of the earliest activation site (18±4 mm) of the sinoatrial nodal region, as documented by ultra-high-density mapping (3442±343 points per map).ConclusionsCoA perturbs HR dynamics and shifts the site of earliest endocardial activation in patients with paroxysmal AF. This effect is abolished by PVI, supporting the value of emerging methods targeting the intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system to treat AF. CoA might be a valuable tool to assess cardiac autonomic function in a clinical setting.

No abstract

Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF), emerging as two epidemics of the twenty-first century, are commonly associated with each other. Both have been mechanistically linked to changes in cardiac vagal control. The importance of peripheral chemosensors, located in the carotid body, has not been elucidated so far. We therefore investigated whether tonic activation of excitatory chemoreceptor afferents contributes to the altered vagal control in HF patients with a history of AF. In 18 patients (72 ±9 year, 7 male) with sinus rhythm and a history of AF (n=9, without any evidence of structural heart disease, AF group; n=9 with structural heart disease and clinical presentation of HF, AFHF group) we investigated the impact of chemosensory deactivation (by breathing 100% oxygen) on heart rate, blood pressure, cardiac output, total peripheral resistance, oxygen saturation and breathing rate. Ten healthy individuals served as a control group. In addition, we performed a deep breathing test demonstrating an impaired heart rate variation in patients with and without HF as compared with controls (expiration/inspiration difference: 23.9±6.9 vs. 6.9±6.1 bpm, and 23.9±6.9 vs. 7.8±4.8 bpm; p<0.05). In both control and AF groups, heart rate decreased during chemoreceptor deactivation (control: -4.8±3.4%; AF: -5.1±3.0%; p<0.05), whereas heart rate did not change in AFHF patients. This resulted in impaired cardiac chemoreflex sensitivity in AFHF patients (1.9±1.6 vs. 0.5±1.2 ms/mmHg; p<0.05). In conclusion, our data suggest that tonic activation of excitatory chemoreceptor afferents contributes to a low vagal tone in heart failure patients with a history of AF (Clinical Trials NCT01262508).