Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) may prolong life and cure patients suffering from otherwise fatal diseases. However, the growing population of long-term survivors has led to the realization of multiple long-term complications, including the risk of second malignancies. Compared to the autologous setting, allo-HCT carries a much higher risk of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), which usually occurs within the first year after allo-HCT and is strongly associated with the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). Treatment-related myelodysplastic syndromes (tMDS) and second leukemias are extremely rare. Both autologous and allo-HCT carry increased risks for second solid malignancies (SSM). The cumulative incidence of SSM continues to increase in each of the largest studies with as much as 20 years of follow-up, likely related to the long latency of radiation-related SSM. Systematic, prospective monitoring, vigilant screening processes, and well-maintained survivorship clinics and databases are absolute necessities, and should be included in the infrastructure of individual transplant centers and networks, with mandatory periodic reporting of second malignancy incidences. Primary care and transplant physicians alike must be aware of the risk of second malignancies after allo-HCT. Most importantly, guidelines should be developed in regard to screening and prevention of second malignancies, so that physicians can provide state-of-the-art counsel and care for the benefit of our patients.
Homocysteine thiolactone (HTL) elicits seizures in mice at a dose of 850 mg/kg (95-100% of animals) with an average latency time of 19.5 min. These seizures are reversed by both 5' N-ethylcarboximide adenosine (NECA) and flunitrazepam, with respective ED50 doses of 0.025 and 0.20 mg/kg. NECA was approximately four-fold more potent as an inhibitor of HTL-induced seizures than of seizures induced by pentylenetetrazol (PTZ, 75 mg/kg). Flunitrazepam was equipotent in both seizure paradigms. The purine precursor 5-amino-4-imidazole carboxamide riboside, (AICAr), although virtually ineffective against PTZ-induced seizures at doses greater than 1 g/kg, was able to inhibit HTL-induced seizures with an ED50 of approximately 350 mg/kg. The anticonvulsant effect of AICAr was dose and time dependent. The anticonvulsant potency of AICAr was increased by simultaneous administration of the adenosine uptake blocker Mioflazine, whereas the central nervous system (CNS)-impermeable adenosine uptake blocker dipyridamole had no effect. The ability of AICAr to permeate the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is limited (less than 1%) and may explain its low potency as an anticonvulsant. AICAr also has very low potency at brain adenosine A1 and A2 receptors as well as adenosine uptake sites (IC50 greater than 10(-3) M), suggesting that its anticonvulsant properties are not mediated by direct action at these sites. The results indicate that AICAr does have frank anticonvulsant effects and further suggest that HTL-induced seizures may represent a useful paradigm for evaluation of adenosinergic agents. AICAr or more potent derivatives thereof may represent a new class of anticonvulsants with the ability to target seizure foci selectively.
A gas-chromatographic method for urinary organic acid analysis is described, designed to be used routinely for the diagnosis of organic aciduria. It involves extraction of urine with ethyl acetate, dehydration of extract residues, and trimethylsilylation. Organic acids are identified by using an extensive list of retention indices published in the accompanying paper (this issue). Quantitative values are given for organic acids in urines from 50 ostensibly normal subjects. Typical chromatograms of urinary organic acids from patients with eight well-established organic acidurias are also shown.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.