Serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels were measured in 139 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and in 88 patients with prostate cancer who were managed by deferred treatment. Acute urinary retention and large prostate glands tended to be associated with high PSA levels, but at levels greater than 10 ng/ml there was a significant risk of carcinoma being found on subsequent histological examination. The risk of progression of untreated prostate cancer was associated with levels of PSA greater than 20 ng/ml and with a high rate of change of PSA level. The value of measuring PSA in these patients is discussed.
Serum prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) levels were studied in the EORTC trial of zoladex plus flutamide versus orchidectomy in metastatic prostatic cancer. Forty‐four of 60 patients had a decrease of PSA to ≤10 ng/ml at 3 to 6 months after treatment. The combination of a PSA > 10 ng/ml after 3 to 6 months treatment and less than 15 spots on the bone scintigram at entry gave the highest probability of not having progressed by 24 months. A rising PSA anticipated bone progression by 6 to 12 months in 13 of 28 patients (46%). The PSA at entry to the trial was related to survival; a discriminant of 300 ng/ml distinguished a poor and better risk group. The lowest level of PSA reached during the first 6 months of treatment was also a univariate survival factor.
This article reviews the serial bone scans of 149 of 327 patients entered into a randomized prospective trial comparing orchidectomy versus zoladex and flutamide in patients with metastatic prostatic cancer. Attention is drawn to the difficulty of evaluating the response rate and of the importance of tumor load in determining survival. The use of sequential bone scans once the diagnosis of metastatic disease has been confirmed is of questionable value as the scans are expensive and contribute little to the further management of the patient in the absence of symptoms requiring relief.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.