Acamprosate is a new psychotropic drug used in the treatment of alcohol (ethanol)-dependence. Recent studies suggest that acamprosate inhibits neuronal hyperexcitability by antagonising excitatory amino acids. It is available as a 333 mg enteric-coated tablet, with a recommended dosage of 1.3 g/day for patients with a bodyweight < 60 kg and 2 g/day for patients with a bodyweight > or = 60 kg. Treatment with higher dose strength tablets 2 x 500 mg twice daily is bioequivalent to treatment with the 2 x 333 mg 3 times daily dosage regimen. Acamprosate is absorbed via the paracellular route in the gastrointestinal tract. Absorption is rapid but limited after oral administration. At steady-state, acamprosate has a moderate distribution volume of about 20L. Acamprosate is not protein bound or metabolised. Half of the elimination of acamprosate occurs as unchanged acetyl-homotaurine in urine, the other half might be eliminated by biliary excretion. The administration of the enteric-coated tablets showed a flip-flop mechanism with a terminal elimination half-life 10-fold higher than the 3-hour half-life reported after intravenous infusion. During repeated oral administration of 666 mg 3 times daily, steady-state is reached after 5 to 7 days and leads to plasma concentrations ranging from 370 to 650 micrograms/L. The pharmacokinetics of acamprosate administered as an enteric-coated tablets are time- and dose-independent, and its accumulation ratio is about 2.4 at steady-state. Acamprosate disposition does not differ between males and females. The pharmacokinetics of acamprosate are not modified in patients with hepatic insufficiency or chronic alcoholism. In contrast, renal insufficiency influences the elimination of acamprosate and it is, therefore, contraindicated under such circumstances. Interaction studies have confirmed that when acamprosate is concomitantly administered with food, the amount absorbed is decreased. When combined with diazepam, disulfiram or alcohol, the pharmacokinetic disposition of acamprosate is not modified. Acamprosate does not influence the kinetics of diazepam, alcohol or imipramine and its metabolite desipramine.

ABSTRACT:An in vitro screening model was developed to determine the reactivity of acyl glucuronide metabolites from carboxylic drugs. This assay is composed of two phases. The first is a phase of biosynthesis of acyl glucuronides by human liver microsomes (HLM). The second, during which acyl glucuronides are incubated with human serum albumin (HSA), consists of assessing the reactivity of acyl glucuronides toward HSA. Both phases are performed successively in the same experiment. This model was validated using eight carboxylic drugs that were well known for their reactivity, their extent of covalent binding, and their immunological potential. These products were representative of the scale of reactivity. Each compound was incubated with HLM at 400 M and metabolized into acyl glucuronide to different extents, ranging from 5.6% (tolmetin) to 89.4% (diclofenac). The first-order aglycone appearance rate constant and the extent of covalent binding to proteins were assayed during the incubation of acyl glucuronides formed with HSA for 24 h. Extensive isomerization phenomenon was observed for each acyl glucuronide between the two phases. An excellent correlation was observed (r 2 , 0.94) between the extent of drug covalent binding to albumin and the aglycone appearance constant weighted by the percentage of isomerization. This correlation represents an in vitro reactivity scale, which will be helpful in drug discovery support programs to predict the covalent binding potential of new chemical entities. This screening model will also allow the comparison of acyl glucuronide reactivity for related structure compounds.Many acidic drugs with carboxylic acid functions are metabolized to reactive acyl glucuronides. These metabolites are unstable at physiological pH and can result in free aglycone by hydrolysis and lead to positional isomers by acyl migration. Acyl migration involves the transfer of the acyl group from the position 1␤ to the C-2, C-3, or C-4 position of the glucuronic acid ring, which results in the formation of isomeric acyl glucuronides (Faed, 1984;Spahn-Langguth and Benet, 1992).Acyl-migrated glucuronide isomers were shown to bind covalently to proteins in vitro and in vivo causing potential toxicity (SpahnLangguth et al., 1996). The glucuronide-mediated toxicity depends on the covalent binding of acyl glucuronides to specific target proteins located in specific tissues. The toxicological mechanisms are still unknown (Park et al., 1987;Riley and Leeder, 1995;Dansette et al., 1998).However, data literature review provides much information regarding immunologically based and clinically relevant adverse reactions of several drugs that are probably related to the formation of highly reactive acyl glucuronides. These drugs include tolmetin, zomepirac, diclofenac, and diflunisal (Hasegawa et al

No abstract

1. The dispositions of two acetylcholinesterase reactivators, pyrimidoxime and HI6, labelled with 14C on the oxime group, have been studied in normal rats and rats poisoned by the organophosphates Soman and A4. 2. For both compounds, and for healthy and poisoned rats, radioactivity was eliminated essentially in the urine (85% dose in 24 h). Faecal elimination was low (4% in 72 h). 3. Both compounds were concentrated in kidney and mucopolysaccharide-containing tissues such as cartilage and intervertebral disc. Soman and A4 poisoning do not modify the kinetic parameters of pyrimidoxime, but A4 poisoning increases HI6 tissue concentration. 4. Chromatography of urine and plasma showed only unchanged pyrimidoxime in both healthy and poisoned animals. In contrast, HI6 in plasma and urine was strongly degraded by scission of the quaternary ammonium bond, and formation of 2-pyridine aldoxime.

In the present study we have compared the steady state biopharmaceutic characteristics of four diltiazem once daily controlled release capsules: Mono-Tildiem LP 300 (300 mg), Adizem XL (300 mg), Cardizem (300 mg) and Dilacor (240 mg). Sixteen healthy male volunteers (aged 22.9 +/- 3.3 years, range 19-31 years) completed an open label, multiple oral dose, randomized, four-period crossover study without a washout period in between. The volunteers received each diltiazem formulation once daily for four days. Trough diltiazem and metabolites plasma concentrations were determined on days 3 and 4. The 24-h plasma concentration-time profiles were assessed after the dose on day 4 of each period. The following steady state pharmacokinetic parameters for diltiazem were calculated: the minimum plasma concentration (cmin), the maximum plasma concentration (cmax), the time to reach that concentration (tmax), the time interval during which the plasma concentration exceeds 50% of cmax (t50), the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC72-96) and the peak-to-trough fluctuation (PTF). For the metabolites of diltiazem, N-mono-desmethyl-diltiazem (NDM) and desacetyldiltiazem (DAD), AUC72-96 (AUCNDM and AUCDAD) and the ratio metabolite/parent compound were calculated. Steady state was achieved on day 3. Except one, all controlled release formulations have satisfactory controlled release properties allowing once daily administration. However, significant (P< 0.05) differences were found between the pharmacokinetic characteristics which do not allow exchange of the various formulations. Concentrations well below 50 ng.mL-1 in the morning hours were observed for Dilacor (240 mg) and Adizem XL (300 mg), which could be a disadvantage of these formulations as it is well-known that ischaemic events occur at a higher rate during that part of the day. The plasma concentration profiles NDM and DAD, the major circulating metabolites, parallel the plasma concentration profiles for the parent compound. From a clinical point of view, all treatments were well tolerated.