This Letter reports on work performed to locate and interrogate a nonlinear scatterer in a linearly elastic medium through the use of a time reversal mirror in combination with nonlinear dynamics. Time reversal provides the means to spatially and temporally localize elastic energy on a scattering feature while the nonlinear dynamics spectrum allows one to determine whether the scatterer is nonlinear (e.g., mechanical damage). Here elastic waves are measured in a solid and processed to extract the nonlinear elastic response. The processed elastic signals are then time reversed, rebroadcast, and found to focus on the nonlinear scatterer, thus defining a time-reversed nonlinear elastic wave spectroscopy process. Additionally, the focusing process illuminates the complexity of the nonlinear scatterer in both space and time, providing a means to image and investigate the origins and physical mechanisms of the nonlinear elastic response.

With the recent application of time reversed acoustics and nonlinear elasticity to imaging mechanical damage, the development of time reversal based nondestructive evaluation techniques has begun. Here, diffusion bonded metal disks containing intentionally disbonded regions are analyzed using the time reversed elastic nonlinearity diagnostic. The nonlinear results are compared with linear ultrasonic imaging (C scan). Scanning electron microscopy is shown to illustrate the differences between the features seen by the linear and nonlinear methods.

Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy (RUS) is a method whereby the elastic tensor of a sample is extracted from a set of measured resonance frequencies. RUS has been used successfully to determine the elastic properties of single crystals and homogeneous samples. In this paper, we study the application of RUS to macroscopic samples of mesoscopically inhomogeneous materials, specifically rock. Particular attention is paid to five issues: the scale of mesoscopic inhomogeneity, imprecision in the figure of the sample, the effects of low Q, optimizing the data sets to extract the elastic tensor reliably, and sensitivity to anisotropy. Using modeling and empirical testing, we find that many of the difficulties associated with using RUS on mesoscopically inhomogeneous materials can be mitigated through the judicious choice of sample size and sample aspect ratio.

International audienceIn this letter, the time reversal mirror is used to focus elastic energy at a prescribed location and to analyze the amplitude dependence of the focus signal, thus providing the nonlinearity of the medium. By varying the frequency content of the focused waveforms, the technique can be used to probe the surface, by penetrating to a depth defined by the wavelength of the focused waves. The validity of this concept is shown in the presence of gradual and distributed damage in concrete by comparing actual results with a reference nonlinear measurement and X ray tomography images

The use of nonlinear acoustic techniques in solids consists in measuring wave distortion arising from compliant features such as cracks, soft intergrain bonds and dislocations. As such, they provide very powerful nondestructive tools to monitor the onset of damage within materials. In particular, a recent technique called dynamic acousto-elasticity testing (DAET) gives unprecedented details on the nonlinear elastic response of materials (classical and non-classical nonlinear features including hysteresis, transient elastic softening and slow relaxation). Here, we provide a comprehensive set of linear and nonlinear acoustic responses on two prismatic concrete specimens; one intact and one pre-compressed to about 70% of its ultimate strength. The two linear techniques used are Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) and Resonance Ultrasound Spectroscopy (RUS), while the nonlinear ones include DAET (fast and slow dynamics) as well as Nonlinear Resonance Ultrasound Spectroscopy (NRUS). In addition, the DAET results correspond to a configuration where the (incoherent) coda portion of the ultrasonic record is used to probe the samples, as opposed to a (coherent) first arrival wave in standard DAET tests. We find that the two visually identical specimens are indistinguishable based on parameters measured by linear techniques (UPV and RUS). On the contrary, the extracted nonlinear parameters from NRUS and DAET are consistent and orders of magnitude greater for the damaged specimen than those for the intact one. This compiled set of linear and nonlinear ultrasonic testing data including the most advanced technique (DAET) provides a benchmark comparison for their use in the field of material characterization.