The results of a test programme to study the use of recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) in high-strength, 50 N/mm 2 or greater, concrete are described. The effects of coarse RCA content on the ceiling strength, bulk engineering and durability properties of such concretes have been established. The results showed that up to 30% coarse RCA had no effect on concrete strength, but thereafter there was a gradual reduction as the RCA content increased. A method of accommodating the effects of high 1KCA content, involving simple adjustment to water/cement ratio of the mix is given. It is shown that high-strength RCA concrete will have equivalent engineering and durability performance to concrete made with natural aggregates, for corresponding 28-day design strengths. The practical implications of the study for concrete construction are discussed. Sont d&its ici les r&ultats d' une s&ie d' essais destin& a dtudier l'utilisation de granulats provenant du recyclage d'~18ments en b~ton (RCA) clans des b&ons de haute r&istance (50 MPa et plus). Les effets de la teneur en gros granulats recycl& sur la r&is-tame des plafonds et des
& The paper describes a study undertaken to examine the suitability of recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) for use in BS 5328 designated mixes. The results for the aggregate characteristics showed that plain as well as reinforced demolished concrete debris can be crushed using existing plant to provide RCA of physical properties that satisfy the current BS 882 requirements. The density of both ®ne and coarse RCA was found to be lower than that of natural aggregate (NA) and water absorption was three to six times higher. The results showed that original strength of the recycled concrete had a negligible eect on the fresh properties of the designated concrete mixes produced. Those mixes with high proportions of RCA were found to be harsh or less cohesive and exhibited higher bleeding, but this could be overcome using a ®ller material, such as coarse PFA. The test results also indicated that up to 30% coarse or 20% ®ne RCA had no eect on the strength of concrete, but thereafter there was a gradual reduction in strength with increase in RCA content. A method for taking account of strength reductions with RCA concrete was proposed, which involved simple adjustment to the water/cement ratio. Studies of concrete durability, comprising (i) near surface absorption, (ii) carbonation rates, (iii) sulphate resistance (in nonaggressive conditions), (iv) freeze/thaw in water and (v) abrasion resistance showed similar performance for RCA and NA concrete mixes of equivalent strength. The practical implications of the study for the construction industry are also considered. IntroductionThe principles of sustainable construction development require prudent use of natural resources and maximum recycling of construction wastes. 1±5 In keeping with this approach, many governments have actively sought to encourage the use of recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) as an alternative to primary aggregates, 4±6 through a combination of research and development work and land®ll taxes. However, a recent survey has shown that of the 70 million tonnes of demolition and construction wastes produced annually in the UK, 7 only 10% is converted into aggregate, mainly for use as a highway ®ll material. 8 The use of RCA in concrete construction represents a further potential outlet for the material. Several investigations have been made to study the eects of RCA on the fresh and engineering properties of concrete. 9±12 However, there are very limited data available on the durability or long-term performance of RCA concrete. This, coupled with the general concern that concrete performance may be compromised with the use of RCA, has tended to restrict its wider use. 2. Given this background, a study was undertaken by the Concrete Technology Unit at the University of Dundee to examine the suitability of RCA for use in BS 5328 designated mixes, 13 namely, the GEN, PAV and RC series. These mixes have modest performance requirements, but within their design range encompass dierent concrete mixes which account for over half of the total concrete used in the UK....
Abstract. The purposes of this study were to evaluate compressive strength, flexural strength, and drying shrinkage of Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) applying different techniques and varying polymer content. Two groups of specimens were classified applying the techniques: sprayed and premixed methods. AR-Glass was used with fiber content of 3 to 4% by volume. GFRC was mixed and applied different techniques with proportions of Styrene Butadiene Rubber (SBR) content of 0%, 3%, 6%, and 9% by weight of cement. Compressive and flexural strength tests were performed at 1 and 28 days. Drying shrinkage tests were measured up to 98 days. The results obtained showed that increasing the SBR content showed a lower compressive strength of GFRC for both sprayed and premixed techniques. In the other hand, 28-day flexural strength results of GFRC for both premixed and sprayed techniques were found to increase with increasing SBR content. The GFRC mixes using sprayed technique exhibited flexural strength higher than the corresponding mixes using premixed technique because of the two-dimensional layer of fiber alignment for the sprayed technique. Increasing the SBR content exhibited the lower drying shrinkage of GFRC. At the age of 98 days, the drying shrinkage of GFRC using 9% SBR content was about 40% lower than that of GFRC using 0% SBR content.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.