A consensus treatment strategy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who recur after definitive radiochemotherapy/radiotherapy has not been established. This study compared the outcomes in ESCC patients who underwent salvage surgery, salvage chemoradiation (CRT) or best supportive care (BSC) for local recurrence. Ninety-five patients with clinical stage I to III ESCC who had completely responded to the initial definitive radiochemotherapy or radiotherapy alone and developed local recurrence were enrolled in this study. Fifty-one of them received salvage esophagectomy, and R0 resection was performed in 41 patients, 36 underwent salvage CRT, and the remaining eight patients received BSC only. The 5-year overall survival was 4.6% for the 87 patients receiving salvage surgery or CRT, while all patients in the BSC group died within 12.0 months, the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.018). The 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates in the salvage surgery and salvage CRT groups were 45.1%, 20.0%, 6.9% and 51.7%, 12.2%, 3.1%, respectively, there was no difference of overall survival between the two groups (P = 0.697). Patients also presented with lymph node relapse had inferior survival compared to those with isolated local tumor recurrence after salvage therapy. In the salvage surgery group, infections occurred in eight patients, and three developed anastomotic leakage. In the salvage CRT group, grade 2-4 esophagitis and radiation pneumonitis was observed in 19 and 3 patients, respectively. Seven patients (19.4%) developed esophagotracheal fistula or esophageal perforation. This study of salvage CRT versus salvage surgery for recurrent ESCC after definitive radiochemotherapy or radiotherapy alone did not demonstrate a statistically significant survival difference, but the frequency of complications including esophagotracheal fistula and esophageal perforation following salvage CRT was high.
Purpose/Objective(s): Stage IV ESCC carries a poor prognosis with a median survival of 6-9 months. The standard treatment has traditionally been chemotherapy. Palliative radiation therapy was used for symptom relief. The optimal treatment for stage IV ESCC has not yet been established. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of CCRT versus chemotherapy alone in patients with stage IV ESCC. Materials/Methods: Patients with stage IV ESCC were randomly assigned to the CCRT group and the chemotherapy group. Both groups of patients received at least 2 cycles of chemotherapy with cisplatin and docetaxel every 3 weeks. Patients in CCRT group received 50-60 Gy/ 25-30 fractions/ 5-6 weeks of concurrent radiation therapy to the esophageal primary tumor. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). The secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), object response rate (ORR) of primary tumor and toxicity. Results: Between August 2013 and October 2015, 60 patients were enrolled and divided into the CCRT group (n Z 30) and the chemotherapy group (n Z 30). The 60 patients were comprised of 48 male and 12 female patients, with a median age of 56 years (range 36-70 years). The baseline clinical characteristics of the 2 groups were similar. Patients in the CCRT group received a mean 54.7 Gy of radiation therapy and a mean 3.6 cycles of chemotherapy, whereas patients in the chemotherapy group received a mean 3.8 cycles. The ORR of the primary tumor was higher in the CCRT group than in the chemotherapy group (83.3% vs. 46.7%, P Z 0.001). At a median follow-up of 18 months, median PFS (9.3 vs. 4.7 months, P Z 0.021) and median OS (18.3 vs. 10.2 months, P Z 0.001) were significantly longer in the CCRT than that in the chemotherapy group. Overall survival rates at 1and 2 years were 73.3% and 43.3% respectively, in the CCRT group, and 46.6%and 26.7% respectively in chemotherapy group (P Z 0.030) Although grade 3 neutropenia was significantly more frequent in the CCRT group than that in the chemotherapy group (33.3% vs. 20.0%, P < 0.05), the rates of other toxicities did not differ. Conclusion: Concurrent chemoradiation therapy was well tolerated and associated with longer PFS and OS than chemotherapy alone in patients with stage IV ESCC. Controlled randomized, multi-center trials are required to determine whether CCRT is a primary treatment option for patients with stage IV ESCC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.