Management of neuroendocrine neoplasia represents a clinical challenge because of its late presentation, lack of treatment options, and limitations in present imaging modalities and biomarkers to guide management. Monoanalyte biomarkers have poor sensitivity, specificity, and predictive ability. A National Cancer Institute summit, held in 2007, on neuroendocrine tumours noted biomarker limitations to be a crucial unmet need in the management of neuroendocrine tumours. A multinational consensus meeting of multidisciplinary experts in neuroendocrine tumours assessed the use of current biomarkers and defined the perquisites for novel biomarkers via the Delphi method. Consensus (at >75%) was achieved for 88 (82%) of 107 assessment questions. The panel concluded that circulating multianalyte biomarkers provide the highest sensitivity and specificity necessary for minimum disease detection and that this type of biomarker had sufficient information to predict treatment effectiveness and prognosis. The panel also concluded that no monoanalyte biomarker of neuroendocrine tumours has yet fulfilled these criteria and there is insufficient information to support the clinical use of miRNA or circulating tumour cells as useful prognostic markers for this disease. The panel considered that trials measuring multianalytes (eg, neuroendocrine gene transcripts) should also identify how such information can optimise the management of patients with neuroendocrine tumours.

Background:Soft-tissue sarcomas are a group of malignancies of mesenchymal origin, which typically have a dismal prognosis if they reach the metastatic stage. The observation of rare spontaneous remissions in patients suffering from concomitant bacterial infections had triggered the clinical investigation of the use of heat-killed bacteria as therapeutic agents (Coley's toxin), which induced complete responses in patients in the pre-chemotherapy era and is now known to mediate substantial elevations in serum TNF levels.Methods:We designed and developed a novel immunocytokine based on murine TNF sequentially fused to the antibody fragment F8 (specific to extra-domain A of fibronectin). The antitumor activity was studied in two syngeneic murine sarcoma models.Results:The L19 antibody (specific to extra-domain B of fibronectin) has shown by SPECT imaging procedures to selectively localise on sarcoma in a patient with a peripheral nerve sheath tumour, and immunohistochemical analysis of human soft-tissue sarcoma samples showed comparable antigen expression of EDA and EDB. The antibody-based pharmacodelivery of TNF by the fusion protein ‘F8–TNF' to oncofetal fibronectin in sarcoma-bearing mice leads to complete and long-lasting tumour eradications when administered in combination with doxorubicin, the first-line drug for the treatment of sarcomas in humans. Doxorubicin alone did not display any therapeutic effect in both tested models of this study. The cured mice had acquired protective immunity against the tumour, as they rejected subsequent challenges with sarcoma cells.Conclusion:The findings of this study provide a rationale for the clinical study of the fully human immunocytokine L19-TNF in combination with doxorubicin in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma.

Purpose:This phase I dose-escalation study was undertaken to establish the maximum tolerated dose of the sequence-selective minor groove DNA binding agent SJG-136 in patients with advanced solid tumors. The study also investigated antitumor activity and provided pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data. Experimental Design: Sixteen patients were assigned sequentially to escalating doses of SJG-136 (15-240 Ag/m 2 ) given as a 10-minute i.v. infusion every 21days. The dose was subsequently reduced in incremental steps to 45 Ag/m 2 due to unexpected toxicity. Results:The maximum tolerated dose of SJG-136 was 45 Ag/m 2 .The main drug-related adverse event was vascular leak syndrome (VLS) characterized by hypoalbuminemia, pleural effusions, ascites, and peripheral edema. Other unexpected adverse events included elevated liver function tests and fatigue. The VLS and liver toxicity had delayed onset and increased in severity with subsequent cycles. Disease stabilization was achieved for >6 weeks in 10 patients; in 2 patients this was maintained for >12 weeks. There was no evidence of DNA interstrand cross-linking in human blood lymphocytes with the use of the comet assay. Evidence of DNA interaction in lymphocytes and tumor cells was shown through a sensitive g-H2AX assay. SJG-136 had linear pharmacokinetics across the dose range tested. Conclusions: SJG-136 was associated with dose-limitingVLS and hepatotoxicity when administered by short injection every 21 days. DNA damage was noted, at all dose levels studied, in circulating lymphocytes. The etiology of the observed toxicities is unclear and is the subject of further preclinical research. Alternative clinical dosing strategies are being evaluated.