Background: Higher body mass index (BMI) has been associated with improved outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. This finding has led to the concept of the obesity paradox.Objective: To investigate the impact of exercise tolerance and cardiorespiratory capacity on the obesity paradox.Methods: Outpatients with symptomatic heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40%, followed up in our center, prospectively underwent baseline comprehensive evaluation including clinical, laboratorial, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing parameters. The study population was divided according to BMI (< 25, 25 -29.9, and ≥ 30 kg/m 2 ). All patients were followed for 60 months. The combined endpoint was defined as cardiac death, urgent heart transplantation, or need for mechanical circulatory support. P value < 0.05 was considered significant.Results: In the 282 enrolled patients (75% male, 54 ± 12 years, BMI 27 ± 4 kg/m 2 , LVEF 27% ± 7%), the composite endpoint occurred in 24.4% during follow-up. Patients with higher BMI were older, and they had higher LVEF and serum sodium levels, as well as lower ventilatory efficiency (VE/VCO 2 ) slope. VE/VCO 2 and peak oxygen consumption (pVO 2 ) were strong predictors of prognosis (p < 0.001). In univariable Cox regression analysis, higher BMI was associated with better outcomes (HR 0.940, CI 0.886 -0.998, p 0.042). However, after adjusting for either VE/VCO 2 slope or pVO 2 , the protective role of BMI disappeared. Survival benefit of BMI was not evident when patients were grouped according to cardiorespiratory fitness class (VE/VCO 2 , cut-off value 35, and pVO 2 , cut-off value 14 mL/kg/min). Conclusion:These results suggest that cardiorespiratory fitness outweighs the relationship between BMI and survival in patients with heart failure.

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Moderate-to-severe functional mitral regurgitation (fMR) is present in about one-third of patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (HFrEF) and contributes to progression of the symptoms of HF and is and independent predictor of worse clinical outcomes. Objective To characterize the population of advanced HF patients with severe fMR and assess its prognostic impact. Methods Prospective evaluation of adult patients with advanced HFrEF were referred to our Institution for evaluation with HF team and possible indication for urgent heart transplantation (HT) or MCS. Patients were followed up for 1 year for the primary endpoint of cardiac death and HT. Severe fMR was defined by an EROA ≥ 20 mm2 and/or a regurgitant volume (RVol) ≥ 30 mL either taken from TTE or TOE. A survival analysis was performed to evaluate the prognostic impact of fMR and survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Results A total of 450 HFrEF patients (mean age of 56 ± 12 years, 80% male, mean LVEF of 29 ± 4%) of which 14.4% had severe fMR, with a mean EROA of 29.2 ± 3.1 mm2 and a mean RVol of 43.6 ± 4.7 mL. Thirty patients (6.7%) met the primary endpoint. Patients with severe fMR were more likely to be female (69.2% vs 81.5%, p = 0.026) and to have atrial fibrillation (27.0% vs 14.1%, p = 0.028), had a higher NT-proBNP value (3625.8 ± 496.9 vs 1940 ± 212.4 pg/mL, p = 0.001), a lower LVEF (25.9 ± 6.8 vs 29.0 ± 6.7, p = 0.001), more dilated LV (LV end-diastolic diameter: 72.8 ± 13.3 vs 66.9 ± 9.0 P = 0.036), a lower HFSS value (8.1 ± 1.0 vs 8.6 ± 1.0). There was no difference regarding HF etiology, NYHA class or cardiopulmonary fitness (pVO2: 16.6 ± 5.6 vs 16.5 ± 6.3 ml/kg/min, p = 0.19; VE/VCO2 slope: 35.4 ± 9.9 vs 34.0 ± 9.7, p = 0.328). EROA was an independent predictor of the primary outcome (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.08-1.54, p = 0.039) and patients with severe fMR had a lower survival free of events during the first follow-up year (log-rank p = 0.012). Conclusion Severe fMR was associated with worse clinical outcomes in advanced HF population. Abstract Figure.

Introduction The incidence of infectious complications related to intracardiac devices has been increasing in recent year and is associated with a poor prognosis, which is determined not only by the infectious process but also by the severity of the underlying cardiac pathology and the spectrum of comorbidities presented. Appropriate antibiotic therapy and extraction of the devices are fundamental in the management of these patients. Case report We describe the case of a 66-year-old patient on a waiting list for transplantation due to non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy with poor left ventricular systolic function (LVEF of 10%), with severe functional mitral regurgitation and severe pulmonary hypertension, who received a CRT-D for secondary prevention (non-responder). He was admitted for decompensated heart failure (NYHA functional class IV and "dry-cold" profile) requiring inotropic support becoming dependent on dobutamine. During hospitalization, there was a progressive increase in inflammatory markers accompanied by recurrent febrile peak and inflammatory signs of the central venous catheter, with catheter-tip and serial hemocultures positive for Morganella morganii. Piperacillin / tazobactam was started. Due to the lack of response to pathogen directed antibiotic therapy, he underwent a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) that revealed several filiform images associated with the electrodes, with no image of valvular vegetations, which led to the association of gentamicin and device extraction (DE), according to the Pisa technique, that occurred without complications. On the 7th day after DE, there was a progressive clinical deterioration in spite of increasing doses of inotropes and vasopressors. It was considered that patient would not be candidate for cardiac transplantation or mechanical ventricular assist, and died on the 118th day of hospitalization in refractory cardiogenic shock. Conclusion Device endocarditis is a class I indication for intracardiac DE and TEE is fundamental in its diagnosis. Despite being a considered a non-responder to cardiac resynchronization therapy based on clinical and echocardiographic criteria, this case illustrates how the loss of cardiac resynchronization may have contributed to the patient’s hemodynamic deterioration and have played a fundamental role in the clinical outcome.

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction In patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), the presence of coexistent right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction is associated with a worse functional capacity and outcome. However, the measurement of RV function is often overshadowed by its left counterpart. Purpose To assess the prognostic impact of RV dysfunction in a population of advanced HF patients. Methods Prospective evaluation of adult patients with advanced HFrEF referred to our Institution for evaluation with HF team for possible indication for urgent heart transplantation (HT) or MCS. Patients were followed up for 1 year for the primary endpoint of cardiac death and HT. RV systolic dysfunction was defined by a tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) &lt; 17 mm and/ or fractional area change (FAC) &lt; 35%. A survival analysis was performed to evaluate the prognostic impact of RV dysfunction and survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Results A total of 450 HFrEF patients (mean age of 56 ± 12 years, 80% male, mean LVEF of 29 ± 4%, mean TAPSE of 19 ± 3 mm and RV FAC of 37 ± 6%), of which 30.4% had RV dysfunction. Thirty patients (6.7%) met the primary endpoint. Patients with RV dysfunction had a higher NT-proBNP value (3278.9 ± 296.7 pg/mL, p = 0.005) and a lower LVEF (26.7 ± 6.4 vs 31.4 ± 5.1, p &lt; 0.001), as well as a worse cardiopulmonary fitness (CPET duration: 7.2 ± 3.8 vs 8.6 ± 4.1, p = 0.019; pVO2: 13.6 ± 4.9 vs 16.2 ± 6.1 ml/kg/min, p = 0.006; VE/VCO2 slope: 41.8 ± 11.9 vs 37.0 ± 10.6, p = 0.015; cardiorespiratory optimal point: 33.0 ± 8.9 vs 28.4 ± 6.2, p &lt; 0.001). RV dysfunction was associated with a lower survival free of events during the first follow-up year (log-rank p = 0.046). Conclusion RV is associated with a poor survival in advanced HF patients and it may improve risk stratification in this population. Abstract Figure.

No abstract