Purpose: Transcription factor C/EBP-α (CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha) acts as a master regulator of hepatic and myeloid functions and multiple oncogenic processes. MTL-CEBPA is a firstin-class small activating RNA oligonucleotide drug which up-regulates C/EBP-α. Experimental Design:We conducted a phase I, open label, dose escalation trial of MTL-CEBPA in adults with advanced HCC with cirrhosis, or resulting from non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) or with liver metastases. Patients received intravenous MTL-CEBPA once a week for 3 weeks followed by a rest period of 1 week per treatment cycle in the dose escalation phase (3+3 design).Results: 38 participants have been treated across 6 dose levels (28-160 mg/m2) and 3 dosing schedules. 34 patients were evaluable for safety endpoints at 28 days. MTL-CEBPA treatmentrelated adverse events were not associated with dose and no maximum dose was reached across the 3 schedules evaluated. Grade 3 treatment related adverse events occurred in 9 (24%) patients. In 24 HCC patients evaluable for efficacy, an objective tumour response was achieved in 1 patient [4%; partial response (PR) for over 2 years] and stable disease (SD) in 12 (50%). After discontinuation of MTL-CEBPA, seven patients were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI); 3 patients had a complete response with one further PR and two with SD.Conclusions: MTL-CEBPA is the first saRNA in clinical trials and demonstrates an acceptable safety profile and potential synergistic efficacy with TKIs in HCC. These encouraging Phase I data validate targeting of C/EBP-α and have prompted MTL-CEBPA + sorafenib combination studies in HCC.Funding: This study was funded by MiNA Therapeutics. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02716012 Statement of translational relevancePreclinical data have emerged suggesting C/EBP-a effects on the tumour microenvironment through myeloid derived suppressor cells could enhance response to sorafenib. The data from this trial provide preliminary validation for targeting C/EBP-a in patients with advanced HCC, particularly in context of sequential administration with TKIs and provide a rationale for combining MTL-CEBPA with TKIs.

Pancreatitis is a significant clinical problem and the lack of effective therapeutic options means that treatment is often palliative rather than curative. A deeper understanding of the pathogenesis of both acute and chronic pancreatitis is necessary to develop new therapies. Pathological changes in pancreatitis are dependent on innate immune cell recruitment to the site of initial tissue damage, and on the coordination of downstream inflammatory pathways. The chemokine receptor CXCR2 drives neutrophil recruitment during inflammation, and to investigate its role in pancreatic inflammation, we induced acute and chronic pancreatitis in wild‐type and Cxcr2−/− mice. Strikingly, Cxcr2−/− mice were strongly protected from tissue damage in models of acute pancreatitis, and this could be recapitulated by neutrophil depletion or by the specific deletion of Cxcr2 from myeloid cells. The pancreata of Cxcr2−/− mice were also substantially protected from damage during chronic pancreatitis. Neutrophil depletion was less effective in this model, suggesting that CXCR2 on non‐neutrophils contributes to the development of chronic pancreatitis. Importantly, pharmacological inhibition of CXCR2 in wild‐type mice replicated the protection seen in Cxcr2−/− mice in acute and chronic models of pancreatitis. Moreover, acute pancreatic inflammation was reversible by inhibition of CXCR2. Thus, CXCR2 is critically involved in the development of acute and chronic pancreatitis in mice, and its inhibition or loss protects against pancreatic damage. CXCR2 may therefore be a viable therapeutic target in the treatment of pancreatitis. © 2015 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

The National Cancer Institute of the United States recently announced a major new initiative in understanding the genomes or, more broadly, the molecular phenotypes of exceptional responders. What can we expect to learn from exceptional responders? What are the potential benefits, and how do we approach studying them?