On the decline of budgetary allocation for libraries, information is being made available to wider audience through alternative means, such as digital libraries and online repositories. Increasing demand for certain print materials urge libraries to exploit open-source alternatives, which are highly advantageous for libraries with scarce financial resources and voracious demand from their users. An interview survey results justified the establishment of digital library service as both students and academics, amongst other issues, recorded their inability to spare time for accessing certain print collections. In this regard, like other libraries in the country, the Library of Eastern University, Sri Lanka has initiated digital library initiatives using freely available software. Amongst a number of open-source software (OSS) available to create and manage digital library collections, Greenstone and DSpace are being experimented for developing two different types of repositories. However, these two software have slight merits and demerits over one another. This paper scrutinizes those features corresponding to the needs of and challenges faced by the Library of Eastern University, Sri Lanka (EUSL), which is in its initial stage of launching digitized collections representing both its academic works and local publications. The demand for unpublished works of students and past examinations papers is always high, hence, the Library is has started digitizing materials in demand and rare to find. This comparative analysis is solely based on experiences gained by the Library of Eastern University, Sri Lanka.

No abstract

Introduction: Primary objective of scientific publications is to disseminate knowledge among researchers and stakeholders of academic investments. Documentation and dissemination of information are being evolved with the aid of emerging technologies in publishing businesses. This amounts to substantial degree of cost incurred with knowledge dissemination, which is further challenging the libraries around the globe that strive to find the balance between demand and supply of information. Since scholarly publication has become commercialized and is gradually taking the core element of academic writing away from the purpose of knowledge-sharing, the library professionals ought to channel the flow of information from its inception to the use, in order ensure credence.

IntroductionLibrary profession is being chiselled by ever-evolving digital era. Libraries and their services have been transformed over the past decades, due to the exponential growth and intricate nature of information resources and user demand. Having said that, information seekers largely depend on Google, thus the notion of alienating the library professionals appears to be quite serious.

Scholarly publication has still been a challenge to young academics that are yearning for sharing their works in high-impact journals. One of the challenges to access to reputed databases is their high subscription rates. Next discouraging factor is that many of these journals charge article processing fees at varying amounts, which are unaffordable to authors with inadequate income background. In general, universities/institutions do not support to pay the publications fees. Thirdly, not every author is better at his/her first attempt to get their works accepted since they need training and experience to master the academic writing. Although the authors find ways to publish their research in renowned journals, their universities are finding it difficult to subscribe to those expensive information resources. Therefore, open access has become not only an advantage to academic institutions that are deprived of adequate budgetary allocations for subscriptions but also a relief to novice academic writers. In this line, Sri Lankan Journals Online (SLJOL) and the e-repositories of universities in the country are making scholarly publications available as open access. SLJOL is a product of the International Network for the Availability of Scientific Publications (INASP) under the joint project of Journals Online. With its inception in August 2008, SLJOL sets its objectives to widen the access to and visibility of research published in Sri Lanka. Since it uses ‘Open Journals System’ that was created by the Public Knowledge Project (based in Canada), journal contents are indexed through Open Archive Initiative that harvest metadata of articles. Thus, SLJOL provides avenue for local authors to have a global audience. Presently, SLJOL provides open access to 60 peer reviewed journal titles published in Sri Lanka, which are covering a wide spectrum of disciplines. Of 60 journals, 36.66% are published by the universities and affiliated institutions, 35% of journals are published by institutes and learned societies, and 21.66% are published by professional organizations and associations, whilst, 6.66% of the publications are contributed by research institutes. The subject coverage of the journals is as follows: Agriculture is 13.33% (8), Architecture, Building and Planning 3.33% (2), Science 10% (6), Education 1.66% (1), Law 1.66% (1), IT and Computer Sciences 1.66% (1), Medicine and subject allied to medicine 40% (24), Multidisciplinary 6.66% (4), Physical Sciences 1.66% (1), Humanities and Social Studies 5 %(3), Management 8.33% (5), Environmental Science 1.66% (1) and Library and Information Science 3.33% (2). Considering electronic repositories, most of the universities, research institutes and other academic societies in Sri Lanka have their own digital collections that are freely accessible. Currently, there are 17 digital repositories are listed on Directory Sri Lankan Institutional Repositories, which contains 53,185 articles in various disciplines. The National Science Foundation (NSF) provides national e-repository, which covers full text scholarly literature of Sri Lankan origin. Research articles and reports, theses and dissertation, conference proceedings, abstracts of research session, and articles authored by academics and researchers of the institutions are stored on these repositories. Finally, the authors intend to kindle awareness about ever proliferating journal business in every nook and corner of academia of the globe. There has been skepticism of these ‘mushroom’ journals for their authenticity and credibility. Eminent academics are hesitant to publish their works in those journals. As a result of which, there has been a gap between knowledge shared on well-known sources and easily-affordable mushroom journals. Therefore, scholarly publications on open access sources need to comply with standards, whilst giving opportunity for research to be available to grassroots level of society.