No abstract

Problem-solving skills are important for medical students and problem-based learning (PBL) is especially suited to general practice. Therefore an experiment using a form of PBL was introduced into a new 4-week course in general practice for final rotation students at the University of Glasgow in the session 1992-93. The experiment aimed to introduce students to an alternative method of learning to the traditional one previously used by them in their course, to encourage teamwork and to encourage the use of alternative methods of obtaining information. The method, centred around allowing the students to investigate problems they choose themselves, is described. The evaluation of the course by written standard form, free written comments and audiotape recorded interviews with a one in four sample of the class is presented. The students selected many interesting problems and used many different and unusual sources of information in researching them. This method of learning was compared with the parallel lecture course and was thought by the students to be more interesting but less relevant than the lecture course. The experiment showed that it is possible to introduce a problem-based form of learning into a new course in parallel with more traditional methods of teaching and for it to be at least partially successful for students much more used to a traditional didactic curriculum. Ways of improving the course in the future to make it more sensitive to the students' learning needs are discussed.

Registrars in general practice have to submit an audit project as one of four parts of summative assessment. A criterion-referenced marking schedule has been developed in the West of Scotland, consisting of five independent criteria all of which have to be judged above minimum competence to pass. A system was developed to test the instrument using a marking exercise which calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the assessment process, for different combinations of assessors. One hundred and two registrar audit projects were then assessed by three independent assessors. Ninety-two (90%) passed and 10 projects (10%) were referred back to the registrar as being below minimum competence. After resubmission six projects (6%) passed, two projects (2%) were still below minimum competence, and two (2%) were not resubmitted. A referral process for assessing the audit projects of general practice registrars has been developed to maximize the opportunity of finding a project below minimum competence.

Evidence from the pilot project has shown that a general practice registrar's ability to review and critically analyse a piece of his/her work, with appropriate management of any necessary change, can be tested feasibly by means of a completed audit cycle within the registrar year. The process retains adequate levels of sensitivity and specificity and requires fewer assessors for marking the projects.

No abstract