This document is an update of Guidelines published in 2005 and now includes scientific publications through to May 2010. It provides evidence-based recommendations for the most common management questions occurring in routine clinical practice in the management of adult patients with LRTI. Topics include management outside hospital, management inside hospital (including community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD), acute exacerbations of bronchiectasis) and prevention. Background sections and graded evidence tables are also included. The target audience for the Guideline is thus all those whose routine practice includes the management of adult LRTI.

The aim of this study was to determine the current incidence of side-effects severe enough to cause intolerance of standard antituberculosis therapy with isoniazid, rifampin and pyrazinamide in patients hospitalized as a result of pulmonary tuberculosis. Five hundred and nineteen patients with proven pulmonary tuberculosis, who initially received standard antituberculosis therapy, were retrospectively studied in the department of infectious diseases in a teaching chest hospital. The incidence of severe side-effects related to the therapy, which led to the definitive termination of one of the three standard drugs, was measured and the risk factors for intolerance were analysed. Final termination of either isoniazid, rifampin or pyrazinamide because of severe side-effects was necessary in 121 of the 519 patients (23%). The most severe side-effects leading to final termination of one drug were hepatotoxicity (11%), exanthema (6%), and arthralgia (2%). Pyrazinamide showed more severe side-effects (15%) than isoniazid (7%) and rifampin (1.5%). Significant risk factors for intolerance of the standard therapy following a multivariate analysis were a history of hepatitis (odds ratio (OR) 3.4; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.6-7.6; p = 0.0026) and an age > or = 60 yrs (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.2-3.2; p = 0.017). Both of these risk factors were also significantly associated with the intolerance of pyrazinamide (history of hepatitis: OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.4-4.3; p = 0.0045; age > or = 60 yrs: OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.5; p = 0.0029) but not of isoniazid and rifampin. The side-effects of standard antituberculosis therapy are frequent in hospitalized patients aged > or = 60 yrs or with a history of previous hepatitis, and are probably due to pyrazinamide rather than to isoniazid or rifampin.

European Commission Framework Programme 6, UK National Institute for Health Research, Barcelona Ciberde Enfermedades Respiratorias, and Research Foundation Flanders.

No abstract

Ceftaroline fosamil achieved high clinical cure and microbiological response rates in patients hospitalized with CAP of PORT risk class III or IV. Ceftaroline fosamil was well tolerated, with a safety profile that is similar to that of ceftriaxone and other cephalosporins. Ceftaroline fosamil is a promising agent for the treatment of CAP.