Less than ten years ago, the impact on plant biology of the gaseous free radical gas nitric oxide (NO . ) related only to its toxic effects as a component of NO x , released into the atmosphere as an air pollutant during the combustion of fossil fuels. It is now clear that NO is a multi-faceted and versatile endogenous signalling molecule with an importance in many if not all aspects of plant growth and development. At least three enzymatic sources of NO in plants have been characterised and mechanisms that serve to scavenge NO have also been identified. Downstream signalling responses to NO include generation and action of the second messenger molecules calcium, cyclic GMP and cyclic ADPR, protein phosphorylation, protein nitrosylation and specific effects on gene expression. NO also interacts directly with Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and with components of ROS-activated signalling pathways. NO and ROS play key roles in an orchestra of plant defence responses. Rapid generation of NO and ROS following pathogen or elicitor challenge mediates a multitude of metabolic and transcriptional alterations including Programmed Cell Death (PCD). However, it is important to note that in some cases the actions of NO can be cytoprotective rather than toxic, potentially via antioxidant effects of NO. Furthermore prevention of NO synthesis or action can delay or inhibit PCD. In addition to the roles of NO and ROS in biotic stress responses, NO and ROS generation also occurs in response to various abiotic stresses, including UV radiation which itself can induce PCD. Recent data suggest that NO mediates some UV responses and that UV radiation can also stimulate the release of NO x from leaves. Key research questions to be addressed must be directed to the effects of UV on NO generation and action in plants. Research programmes will require methods to assess accurately NO emissions from leaves and other organs and to determine NO concentrations in cells and sub-cellular microdomains; the use of mutants and transgenic plants altered in NO synthetic and scavenging capacities; analyses of the molecular and biochemical events required for activation of PCD by NO and UV; and the development of techniques to monitor simultaneously cell death, NO and ROS generation in the field during exposure to UV.
A proteomic approach was used to identify host proteins altering in abundance during Peronospora viciae infection of a susceptible cultivar of pea (Pisum sativum cv. Livioletta). Proteins were extracted from fully developed pea leaflets at 4 days post-inoculation, before visible symptoms were apparent. Cytoplasmic proteins and membrane-and nucleic acid-associated proteins from infected and control leaves were examined using two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis. The majority of proteins had a similar abundance in control and infected leaves; however, several proteins were altered in abundance and twelve were found to have increased significantly in the latter. These proteins were selected for either matrix-assisted laser desorption/ ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry or electrospray ionisation quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry analysis following trypsin digestion, with sequence identity being assigned to eight of the proteins. These included the ABR17 stress-response protein, the pathogen-induced PI176 protein, three photosynthetic proteins, a glycine-rich RNA binding protein and two glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenases (cytosolic and chloroplastic) which can be induced by a range of abiotic and biotic stresses in many plant species. The possible roles of these proteins in the response of the pea plant during P. viciae infection are discussed. This study represents the first proteomic analysis of downy mildew infection of pea leaves, and provides the basis for further work to elucidate molecular mechanisms of compatibility in P. viciae infections.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.