Background:Recently evolved from a monochromic flu-like disease to a polysyndromic “spectrum of disease”, our understanding of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still far from being complete [1]. Hyperinflammation involving not only the lungs but also the musculoskeletal system, skin, cardiovascular, genitourinary systems is immune-mediated resembling the flares of a full-blown rheumatic disease [2,3].Objectives:To describe the prevalence and type of rheumatic manifestations in a cohort of COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the COVID-19 rheumatology department in University Hospital St. Marina, Varna, Bulgaria.Methods:In the present single-center cohort study, а retrospective database analysis was performed among all COVID-19 patients hospitalized from 1 Dec 2020 to 22 Jan 2021. All 243 patients (age 19 - 93 years) were treated for moderate or severe SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by laboratory tests, including positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, and imaging modality. Inpatient treatment included antibiotics, dexamethasone, anticoagulants, and antiviral drug remdesevir (optional). Detailed disease history and clinical examination were carried out by a fully certified rheumatologist and/or specialist in internal medicine.Results:Among all 243 COVID-19 patients, those with prominent self-reported myalgia and arthralgia were 26% (n = 63) and 21.3 (n = 52), respectively. We had 4 (1.6%) cases of newly developed cutaneous vasculitis and 2 (0.8%) cases of severe Raynaud’s phenomenon after SARS-CoV-2 infection onset. Two patients experienced severe muscle weakness, had elevated creatine phosphokinase, and were diagnosed with inflammatory myopathy secondary to COVID-19. Lupus-like syndrome was observed in 2 (0.8%) patients.Conclusion:Rheumatic manifestations are part of the heterogeneous spectrum of COVID-19 disease. Amidst the COVID-19 crisis, each newly onset rheumatic manifestation warrants exclusion of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Therefore, a rheumatologist should be a part of a multidisciplinary approach towards the COVID-19 treatment.References:[1]Misra DP, Agarwal V, Gasparyan AY, Zimba O. Rheumatologists’ perspective on coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) and potential therapeutic targets. Clin Rheumatol. 2020;39(7):2055-2062[2]Georgiev T, Angelov AK. Complexities of diagnosis and management of COVID-19 in autoimmune diseases: Potential benefits and detriments of immunosuppression. World J Clin Cases. 2020;8(17):3669-3678[3]Ciaffi J, Meliconi R, Ruscitti P, Berardicurti O, Giacomelli R, Ursini F. Rheumatic manifestations of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC rheumatology. 2020 Dec;4(1):1-5.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

No abstract

Introduction: The European League Against Rheumatism updates the recommendations for managing rheumatoid arthritis. Again, it is not specified which DAS28 is there in view (with erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein). &nbsp; Aim: The aim of the study is to check whether Disease Activity Score-28 (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive protein) represent equally the activity of rheumatoid arthritis in the course of treatment with biological agents. &nbsp; Materials and methods: In a retrospective study we analyzed the database of real clinical practice over a 12-month period of biological treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Disease Activity Score-28 (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and (C-reactive protein) are compared at the start and at the end of the study. &nbsp; Results: The mean difference between the two variants of disease activity scores at baseline and at the end of the study is significant (p < 0.001). The Disease Activity Score-28 (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) represents a remarkably small proportion of patients with remission and low activity (<3.2) at baseline (18.46%) and at the end of the study (40.51%). Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive protein) represents a significantly high proportion of patients in remission and low activity (<3.2) at the end of the study (69.74%). Estimates of activity according to the two variants show significant discrepancy between each other and low level of agreement (kappa = 0.235-0.464). Discrepancies are not related to the type of biological drug (anti-TNF or not). &nbsp; Conclusion: The two DAS28 variants are not interchangeable with the same threshold for low activity in measuring the response to biological therapy.

Although it has been almost three years since the World Health Organization (WHO) declared a pandemic, COVID-19 is still an unsolved problem, thereby attracting great scientific interest. The disease has a heterogeneous clinical picture with multiple manifestations from different organs and systems. Currently, COVID-19 is perceived as a polysyndromic inflammatory disease involving not only the respiratory system, but also the musculoskeletal system, the cardiovascular system, the skin, the excretory and the nervous system, and is accompanied by a number of hematological, gastrohepatoenterological and endocrine disorders. Various pain phenomena also appear in the clinical presentation of the disease, often as a single manifestation or in combination with symptoms from different organs and systems. The pathogenesis of pain is complex and there is still no consensus on the exact driving mechanisms. Several different signaling pathways play an important role in the generation of pain impulses and perception. They are different for different types of pain. At this stage, the role of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE), the renin-angiotensin system (RAC), angiotensin 2 receptors (AT2R), direct neuronal invasion of the virus, the involvement of pro-inflammatory cytokines, hypoxia, the involvement of macrophages, is discussed. as well as the role of overactivity of the immune system, causing the so-called "cytokine storm". Pain is the result of complex biochemical processes influenced to varying degrees by biological, physiological and social factors. Our knowledge at this stage remains scarce and is the subject of many studies on the key pathogenic mechanisms. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to describe the known mechanisms for the occurrence and persistence of pain in patients with COVID-19, as well as to classify the pain phenomena and present its most common localizations. The diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19 and associated pain should be carried out by a multidisciplinary team of specialists, given the heterogeneous clinical presentation of the disease.