RESUMO Introdução: A atividade física é um importante parâmetro a ser quantificado em idosos. São necessários instrumentos de medida confiáveis para avaliar e elaborar metas de intervenções terapêuticas efetivas e verificar a evolução do paciente. Objetivo: Adaptar transculturalmente e determinar a confiabilidade teste-reteste e interexaminadores do Active Australia Questionnaire em idosos da comunidade. Métodos: A adaptação transcultural foi realizada de acordo com os critérios propostos por Guillemin e Beaton, a saber, tradução, retrotradução, síntese das traduções, apresentação ao comitê de especialistas e aplicação da versão pré-final para testar o questionário. Para a confiabilidade teste-reteste foi dado um intervalo de quatro horas para as coletas e um intervalo de seis horas para a análise interexaminador, após o reteste. Foram consideradas as informações de atividade física nos últimos sete dias. A caracterização da amostra foi feita pela análise descritiva. Para a análise da confiabilidade utilizou-se o coeficiente de correlação intraclasse (CCI). Participaram do estudo 22 idosos (72,5 ± 5,3 anos) e com 7,6 ± 3,9 anos de escolaridade. Resultados: A confiabilidade teste-reteste foi CCI = 0,97 e interexaminadores CCI = 0,82. Conclusão: O instrumento mostrou-se semântica e linguisticamente adequado e confiável, para avaliar o nível de atividade física em idosos na comunidade.

IntroductionRisk perception of COVID-19 is potentially a significant determinant of the pandemic evolution and the public’s response to it. Acceptable levels of risk perception can be considered good for people to effectively fight the pandemic and adopt preventive health behaviors while high levels of risk perception may be damaging. Recently, Yıldırım&Güler (2020) developed the Covid-19 Perceived Risk Scale (C19PRS) to measure this construct.ObjectivesTo analyze the psychometric properties of the C19PRS Portuguese version, namely construct validity, internal consistency and convergent validity.MethodsA community sample of 234 adults (75.6% women; mean age= 29.53±12.51; range:16-71) completed an on-line survey with the Portuguese versions of the CPRS and the Fear of Covid-19 Scale (FCV-19S; Cabaços et al. 2020). The total sample was randomly divided in two sub-samples: sample A (n=117) was used to perform an exploratory factor analysis/EFA; sample B (n=117) to make a confirmatory factor analysis/CFA.ResultsEFA resulted in three components. CFA revealed that the second-order model with three factors presented good fit indexes (X2/df=1.471; CFI=.959; GFI=.948; TLI=.932; p[RMSEA≤.01]=.065). CPRS Cronbach alphas was α=.687; for F1 Worry, F2 Susceptibility to Covid-19 and F3 Susceptibility to Overall Morbimortality were α=.747, α=.813 and α=.543, respectively. The total and dimensional scores significantly correlated with FCV-19S (r>.30, p<.01).ConclusionsThis study provides evidence for the validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of CPRS, which will be used in an ongoing research project on the relationship between Covid-19 perceived risk, perfectionism, cognitive processes and adherence to public health measures to contain the pandemic.

IntroductionResearch following the Covid-19 pandemics has shown that psychological reactions to the pandemic and its constraints can vary significantly depending on personality. One of the traits that has not been studied yet, but can play a harmful role in the COVID-19 psychological impact is perfectionism. This trait, characterized by setting excessively high standards of performance and striving for flawlessness, has increased in recent years and is considered a transdiagnostic process involved in several (mental) health problems (Curran & Hill 2019).ObjectivesTo analyze the role of Perfectionism in the levels of fear of COVID19 and of perception of infection risk by COVID-19.Methods234 adults (75.6% women; mean age=29.53±12.51) completed an on-line survey with the Portuguese validated versions of Covid-19 Perceived Risk Scale (C19PRS; Pereira et al. 2020), Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FC19S; Cabaços et al. 2020) and Big Three Perfectionism Scale (BTPS; Garrido et al. 2020). SPSS was used to perform correlation and regression analysis.ResultsPerceived Risk and Fear of COVID-19 were significantly correlated with perfectionism (.243, .228, respectively) (both, p<.01). Perfectionism explains 5.5% (Adjusted R2) of the FC19S variance (Beta=.243, p<.001) and 4.8% of the C19PRS variance (Beta=.228, p=.01).ConclusionsThis study provides preliminary, but completely innovative evidence that perfectionism contribute to the psychological impact of Covid-19 pandemics. In the near future we will test the hypothesis that the nature of unpredictability and the limitations imposed by the global crisis may be exacerbating the already high levels of psychological distress that affect negative perfectionists.